From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Yin Fengwei <fengwei.yin@intel.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Optimize large folio interaction with deferred split
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2023 17:42:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b308fbb3-73a1-f8b4-3b08-ed5da044b2a9@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230727141837.3386072-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Hi Andrew,
After discussion about this in Matthew's THP Cabal, we have decided to take a
different approach with this patch set. Could you therefore remove it from
mm-unstable, please? Sorry about the noise.
I'm going to try 2 different approaches:
- avoid the split lock contention by using mmu gather (suggested by Kirill)
- expand the zap pte batching to also cover file folios (as requested by Yu).
Thanks,
Ryan
On 27/07/2023 15:18, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This is v4 of a small series in support of my work to enable the use of large
> folios for anonymous memory (known as "FLEXIBLE_THP" or "LARGE_ANON_FOLIO") [5].
> It first makes it possible to add large, non-pmd-mappable folios to the deferred
> split queue. Then it modifies zap_pte_range() to batch-remove spans of
> physically contiguous pages from the rmap, which means that in the common case,
> we elide the need to ever put the folio on the deferred split queue, thus
> reducing lock contention and improving performance.
>
> This becomes more visible once we have lots of large anonymous folios in the
> system, and Huang Ying has suggested solving this needs to be a prerequisit for
> merging the main FLEXIBLE_THP/LARGE_ANON_FOLIO work.
>
> The series applies on top of v6.5-rc3 and a branch is available at [4].
>
> NOTE: v3 is currently in mm-unstable and has a bug that affects s390, which this
> version fixes.
>
>
> Changes since v3 [3]
> --------------------
>
> - Fixed bug reported on s390 [6]
> - Since s390 enables MMU_GATHER_NO_GATHER, __tlb_remove_page() causes a ref
> to be dropped on the page, but we were still using the page after that
> function call.
> - Fix by using folio_get()/folio_put() to guarrantee lifetime of page
> - Thanks to Nathan Chancellor for the bug report and helping me get set up
> with s390!
> - Don't use batch path if folio is not large
>
>
> Changes since v2 [2]
> --------------------
>
> - patch 2: Reworked at Yu Zhou's request to reduce duplicated code.
> - page_remove_rmap() now forwards to folio_remove_rmap_range() for the
> !compound (PMD mapped) case.
> - Both page_remove_rmap() and folio_remove_rmap_range() share common
> epilogue via new helper function __remove_rmap_finish().
> - As a result of the changes, I've removed the previous Reviewed-bys.
> - other 2 patches are unchanged.
>
>
> Changes since v1 [1]
> --------------------
>
> - patch 2: Modified doc comment for folio_remove_rmap_range()
> - patch 2: Hoisted _nr_pages_mapped manipulation out of page loop so its now
> modified once per folio_remove_rmap_range() call.
> - patch 2: Added check that page range is fully contained by folio in
> folio_remove_rmap_range()
> - patch 2: Fixed some nits raised by Huang, Ying for folio_remove_rmap_range()
> - patch 3: Support batch-zap of all anon pages, not just those in anon vmas
> - patch 3: Renamed various functions to make their use clear
> - patch 3: Various minor refactoring/cleanups
> - Added Reviewed-By tags - thanks!
>
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20230717143110.260162-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20230719135450.545227-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com/
> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20230720112955.643283-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com/
> [4] https://gitlab.arm.com/linux-arm/linux-rr/-/tree/features/granule_perf/deferredsplit-lkml_v4
> [5] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20230714160407.4142030-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com/
> [6] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20230726161942.GA1123863@dev-arch.thelio-3990X/
>
> Thanks,
> Ryan
>
>
> Ryan Roberts (3):
> mm: Allow deferred splitting of arbitrary large anon folios
> mm: Implement folio_remove_rmap_range()
> mm: Batch-zap large anonymous folio PTE mappings
>
> include/linux/rmap.h | 2 +
> mm/memory.c | 132 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> mm/rmap.c | 125 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 3 files changed, 229 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-02 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-27 14:18 Ryan Roberts
2023-07-27 14:18 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] mm: Allow deferred splitting of arbitrary large anon folios Ryan Roberts
2023-07-27 14:18 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] mm: Implement folio_remove_rmap_range() Ryan Roberts
2023-07-27 14:18 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] mm: Batch-zap large anonymous folio PTE mappings Ryan Roberts
2023-07-27 17:22 ` Yu Zhao
2023-07-28 9:16 ` Ryan Roberts
2023-08-01 7:12 ` Yu Zhao
2023-08-03 13:57 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-03 13:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-03 13:50 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-03 13:56 ` Ryan Roberts
2023-08-03 14:10 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-03 14:15 ` Ryan Roberts
2023-08-03 14:21 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-03 14:28 ` Zi Yan
2023-08-02 16:42 ` Ryan Roberts [this message]
2023-08-02 17:02 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] Optimize large folio interaction with deferred split Yu Zhao
2023-08-03 12:01 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-08-03 12:48 ` Ryan Roberts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b308fbb3-73a1-f8b4-3b08-ed5da044b2a9@arm.com \
--to=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=fengwei.yin@intel.com \
--cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=yuzhao@google.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox