linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Bang Li <libang.li@antgroup.com>,
	hughd@google.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: david@redhat.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
	wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, ziy@nvidia.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] support "THPeligible" semantics for mTHP with anonymous shmem
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 14:47:46 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b2e6fac2-7c23-4a92-8d89-ff29b8566967@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240628104926.34209-1-libang.li@antgroup.com>

CC Barry.

On 2024/6/28 18:49, Bang Li wrote:
> After the commit 7fb1b252afb5 ("mm: shmem: add mTHP support for
> anonymous shmem"), we can configure different policies through
> the multi-size THP sysfs interface for anonymous shmem. But
> currently "THPeligible" indicates only whether the mapping is
> eligible for allocating THP-pages as well as the THP is PMD
> mappable or not for anonymous shmem, we need to support semantics
> for mTHP with anonymous shmem similar to those for mTHP with
> anonymous memory.

I did not see a consensus that "THP*" related statistics should contain 
mTHP in previous discussion [1].

In addition, if we all agree that "THPeligible" should include mTHP 
statistics, you should update the corresponding documentation to keep 
consistency.

[1] 
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/202406262300.iAURISyJ-lkp@intel.com/T/#md7a77056110cebcc2a9b3cd7e4a8d682667f6ba5

> Signed-off-by: Bang Li <libang.li@antgroup.com>
> ---
>   fs/proc/task_mmu.c      | 10 +++++++---
>   include/linux/huge_mm.h | 11 +++++++++++
>   mm/shmem.c              |  9 +--------
>   3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> index 93fb2c61b154..09b5db356886 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> @@ -870,6 +870,7 @@ static int show_smap(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
>   {
>   	struct vm_area_struct *vma = v;
>   	struct mem_size_stats mss = {};
> +	bool thp_eligible;
>   
>   	smap_gather_stats(vma, &mss, 0);
>   
> @@ -882,9 +883,12 @@ static int show_smap(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
>   
>   	__show_smap(m, &mss, false);
>   
> -	seq_printf(m, "THPeligible:    %8u\n",
> -		   !!thp_vma_allowable_orders(vma, vma->vm_flags,
> -			   TVA_SMAPS | TVA_ENFORCE_SYSFS, THP_ORDERS_ALL));
> +	thp_eligible = !!thp_vma_allowable_orders(vma, vma->vm_flags,
> +						TVA_SMAPS | TVA_ENFORCE_SYSFS, THP_ORDERS_ALL);
> +	if (vma_is_anon_shmem(vma))
> +		thp_eligible = !!shmem_allowable_huge_orders(file_inode(vma->vm_file),
> +							vma, vma->vm_pgoff, thp_eligible);
> +	seq_printf(m, "THPeligible:    %8u\n", thp_eligible);
>   
>   	if (arch_pkeys_enabled())
>   		seq_printf(m, "ProtectionKey:  %8u\n", vma_pkey(vma));
> diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> index 212cca384d7e..f87136f38aa1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> @@ -267,6 +267,10 @@ unsigned long thp_vma_allowable_orders(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>   	return __thp_vma_allowable_orders(vma, vm_flags, tva_flags, orders);
>   }
>   
> +unsigned long shmem_allowable_huge_orders(struct inode *inode,
> +				struct vm_area_struct *vma, pgoff_t index,
> +				bool global_huge);
> +
>   struct thpsize {
>   	struct kobject kobj;
>   	struct list_head node;
> @@ -460,6 +464,13 @@ static inline unsigned long thp_vma_allowable_orders(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> +static inline unsigned long shmem_allowable_huge_orders(struct inode *inode,
> +				struct vm_area_struct *vma, pgoff_t index,
> +				bool global_huge)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>   #define transparent_hugepage_flags 0UL
>   
>   #define thp_get_unmapped_area	NULL
> diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
> index d495c0701a83..aa85df9c662a 100644
> --- a/mm/shmem.c
> +++ b/mm/shmem.c
> @@ -1622,7 +1622,7 @@ static gfp_t limit_gfp_mask(gfp_t huge_gfp, gfp_t limit_gfp)
>   }
>   
>   #ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
> -static unsigned long shmem_allowable_huge_orders(struct inode *inode,
> +unsigned long shmem_allowable_huge_orders(struct inode *inode,
>   				struct vm_area_struct *vma, pgoff_t index,
>   				bool global_huge)
>   {
> @@ -1707,13 +1707,6 @@ static unsigned long shmem_suitable_orders(struct inode *inode, struct vm_fault
>   	return orders;
>   }
>   #else
> -static unsigned long shmem_allowable_huge_orders(struct inode *inode,
> -				struct vm_area_struct *vma, pgoff_t index,
> -				bool global_huge)
> -{
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -
>   static unsigned long shmem_suitable_orders(struct inode *inode, struct vm_fault *vmf,
>   					   struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t index,
>   					   unsigned long orders)


  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-01  6:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-28 10:49 Bang Li
2024-07-01  6:47 ` Baolin Wang [this message]
2024-07-01  6:55   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-01  7:18     ` Baolin Wang
2024-07-01  8:22     ` Bang Li
2024-07-01  6:57 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-01  8:24   ` Bang Li
2024-07-01  7:55 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-07-01  8:33   ` Baolin Wang
2024-07-01  8:40     ` Ryan Roberts
2024-07-01  8:46       ` Baolin Wang
2024-07-01  8:48       ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-01  8:50         ` Ryan Roberts
2024-07-01  8:57           ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-01  9:14             ` Ryan Roberts
2024-07-01  9:17               ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-01 10:16                 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-07-01 10:22                   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-01 18:20                     ` Yang Shi
2024-07-02  8:24                       ` Ryan Roberts
2024-07-02  8:28                         ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-03 16:08                         ` Yang Shi
2024-07-03 16:19                           ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-04  9:43                           ` Ryan Roberts
2024-07-09 19:01                             ` Yang Shi
2024-07-01  9:43     ` Bang Li
2024-07-01 11:12       ` Baolin Wang
2024-07-01 14:51         ` Bang Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b2e6fac2-7c23-4a92-8d89-ff29b8566967@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=libang.li@antgroup.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox