linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: compaction: refactor compact_node()
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 14:40:49 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b2c186a4-2c56-4ee1-ae4c-11a59ece0993@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240208013607.1731817-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>



On 2024/2/8 09:36, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> Refactor compact_node() to handle both proactive and synchronous compact
> memory, which cleanups code a bit.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>

LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>

> ---
> v2:
> - drop proactive_compact_node() and add comments for compact_node()
>    suggested by Andrew
> 
>   mm/compaction.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++---------------------------------
>   1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> index e63a4ee7e029..de882ecb61c5 100644
> --- a/mm/compaction.c
> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> @@ -2885,25 +2885,27 @@ enum compact_result try_to_compact_pages(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
>   }
>   
>   /*
> - * Compact all zones within a node till each zone's fragmentation score
> - * reaches within proactive compaction thresholds (as determined by the
> - * proactiveness tunable).
> + * compact_node() - compact all zones within a node
> + * @pgdat: The node page data
> + * @proactive: Whether the compaction is proactive
>    *
> - * It is possible that the function returns before reaching score targets
> - * due to various back-off conditions, such as, contention on per-node or
> - * per-zone locks.
> + * For proactive compaction, compact till each zone's fragmentation score
> + * reaches within proactive compaction thresholds (as determined by the
> + * proactiveness tunable), it is possible that the function returns before
> + * reaching score targets due to various back-off conditions, such as,
> + * contention on per-node or per-zone locks.
>    */
> -static void proactive_compact_node(pg_data_t *pgdat)
> +static void compact_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, bool proactive)
>   {
>   	int zoneid;
>   	struct zone *zone;
>   	struct compact_control cc = {
>   		.order = -1,
> -		.mode = MIGRATE_SYNC_LIGHT,
> +		.mode = proactive ? MIGRATE_SYNC_LIGHT : MIGRATE_SYNC,
>   		.ignore_skip_hint = true,
>   		.whole_zone = true,
>   		.gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL,
> -		.proactive_compaction = true,
> +		.proactive_compaction = proactive,
>   	};
>   
>   	for (zoneid = 0; zoneid < MAX_NR_ZONES; zoneid++) {
> @@ -2915,41 +2917,16 @@ static void proactive_compact_node(pg_data_t *pgdat)
>   
>   		compact_zone(&cc, NULL);
>   
> -		count_compact_events(KCOMPACTD_MIGRATE_SCANNED,
> -				     cc.total_migrate_scanned);
> -		count_compact_events(KCOMPACTD_FREE_SCANNED,
> -				     cc.total_free_scanned);
> -	}
> -}
> -
> -/* Compact all zones within a node */
> -static void compact_node(int nid)
> -{
> -	pg_data_t *pgdat = NODE_DATA(nid);
> -	int zoneid;
> -	struct zone *zone;
> -	struct compact_control cc = {
> -		.order = -1,
> -		.mode = MIGRATE_SYNC,
> -		.ignore_skip_hint = true,
> -		.whole_zone = true,
> -		.gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL,
> -	};
> -
> -
> -	for (zoneid = 0; zoneid < MAX_NR_ZONES; zoneid++) {
> -
> -		zone = &pgdat->node_zones[zoneid];
> -		if (!populated_zone(zone))
> -			continue;
> -
> -		cc.zone = zone;
> -
> -		compact_zone(&cc, NULL);
> +		if (proactive) {
> +			count_compact_events(KCOMPACTD_MIGRATE_SCANNED,
> +					     cc.total_migrate_scanned);
> +			count_compact_events(KCOMPACTD_FREE_SCANNED,
> +					     cc.total_free_scanned);
> +		}
>   	}
>   }
>   
> -/* Compact all nodes in the system */
> +/* Compact all zones of all nodes in the system */
>   static void compact_nodes(void)
>   {
>   	int nid;
> @@ -2958,7 +2935,7 @@ static void compact_nodes(void)
>   	lru_add_drain_all();
>   
>   	for_each_online_node(nid)
> -		compact_node(nid);
> +		compact_node(NODE_DATA(nid), false);
>   }
>   
>   static int compaction_proactiveness_sysctl_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
> @@ -3020,7 +2997,7 @@ static ssize_t compact_store(struct device *dev,
>   		/* Flush pending updates to the LRU lists */
>   		lru_add_drain_all();
>   
> -		compact_node(nid);
> +		compact_node(NODE_DATA(nid), false);
>   	}
>   
>   	return count;
> @@ -3229,7 +3206,7 @@ static int kcompactd(void *p)
>   			unsigned int prev_score, score;
>   
>   			prev_score = fragmentation_score_node(pgdat);
> -			proactive_compact_node(pgdat);
> +			compact_node(pgdat, true);
>   			score = fragmentation_score_node(pgdat);
>   			/*
>   			 * Defer proactive compaction if the fragmentation


      reply	other threads:[~2024-02-19  6:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-08  1:36 Kefeng Wang
2024-02-19  6:40 ` Baolin Wang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b2c186a4-2c56-4ee1-ae4c-11a59ece0993@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox