From: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/slab: protect cache_reap() against CPU and memory hot plug operations
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 17:28:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b2b80faf-2670-da69-60d9-f244d1597139@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190312145813.GS5721@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Le 12/03/2019 à 15:58, Michal Hocko a écrit :
> On Mon 11-03-19 20:17:01, Laurent Dufour wrote:
>> The commit 95402b382901 ("cpu-hotplug: replace per-subsystem mutexes with
>> get_online_cpus()") remove the CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE operation which was use to
>> grap the cache_chain_mutex lock which was protecting cache_reap() against
>> CPU hot plug operations.
>>
>> Later the commit 18004c5d4084 ("mm, sl[aou]b: Use a common mutex
>> definition") changed cache_chain_mutex to slab_mutex but this didn't help
>> fixing the missing the cache_reap() protection against CPU hot plug
>> operations.
>>
>> Here we are stopping the per cpu worker while holding the slab_mutex to
>> ensure that cache_reap() is not running in our back and will not be
>> triggered anymore for this cpu.
>>
>> This patch fixes that race leading to SLAB's data corruption when CPU
>> hotplug are triggered. We hit it while doing partition migration on PowerVM
>> leading to CPU reconfiguration through the CPU hotplug mechanism.
>
> What is the actual race? slab_offline_cpu calls cancel_delayed_work_sync
> so it removes a pending item and waits for the item to finish if they run
> concurently. So why do we need an additional lock?
You're right.
Reading cancel_delayed_work_sync() again I can't see how this could help.
The tests done with that patch were successful, while we were seeing a
SLAB data corruption without it, but this needs to be investigated
further since this one should not help. This was perhaps a lucky side
effect.
Please forgot about this one.
>
>> This fix is covering kernel containing to the commit 6731d4f12315 ("slab:
>> Convert to hotplug state machine"), ie 4.9.1, earlier kernel needs a
>> slightly different patch.
>>
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
>> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
>> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
>> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> mm/slab.c | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
>> index 28652e4218e0..ba499d90f27f 100644
>> --- a/mm/slab.c
>> +++ b/mm/slab.c
>> @@ -1103,6 +1103,7 @@ static int slab_online_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
>>
>> static int slab_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
>> {
>> + mutex_lock(&slab_mutex);
>> /*
>> * Shutdown cache reaper. Note that the slab_mutex is held so
>> * that if cache_reap() is invoked it cannot do anything
>> @@ -1112,6 +1113,7 @@ static int slab_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
>> cancel_delayed_work_sync(&per_cpu(slab_reap_work, cpu));
>> /* Now the cache_reaper is guaranteed to be not running. */
>> per_cpu(slab_reap_work, cpu).work.func = NULL;
>> + mutex_unlock(&slab_mutex);
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> --
>> 2.21.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-12 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-11 19:17 Laurent Dufour
2019-03-12 14:58 ` Michal Hocko
2019-03-12 16:28 ` Laurent Dufour [this message]
2019-03-25 0:38 ` Sasha Levin
2019-03-25 10:28 ` Laurent Dufour
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b2b80faf-2670-da69-60d9-f244d1597139@linux.ibm.com \
--to=ldufour@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox