From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86DFAC433FE for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 09:24:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id F0F636B0074; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 05:24:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id EBFB26B0075; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 05:24:20 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id DAE0E8E0001; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 05:24:20 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0010.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.10]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAA076B0074 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 05:24:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin25.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay06.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77601AB9E5 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 09:24:20 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 80040791880.25.4B8D5CF Received: from out30-54.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-54.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.54]) by imf08.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B482716003B for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 09:24:18 +0000 (UTC) X-Alimail-AntiSpam:AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R111e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=ay29a033018045192;MF=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=8;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0VSebxZI_1666257853; Received: from 30.97.48.62(mailfrom:baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0VSebxZI_1666257853) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 17:24:14 +0800 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 17:24:13 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.3.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: gup: Re-pin pages in case of trying several times to migrate To: "Huang, Ying" Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@redhat.com, ziy@nvidia.com, shy828301@gmail.com, jingshan@linux.alibaba.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <87r0z2nc6j.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com> From: Baolin Wang In-Reply-To: <87r0z2nc6j.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf08.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (imf08.hostedemail.com: domain of baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com designates 115.124.30.54 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=alibaba.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1666257860; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=dTDxdCxbkWb290i8H9DNgL5FFs4AzuRfF/geV23STR5FkCbz8CRhxTgqtzw4rPkDQRDsu2 F+WiKhsNnAG3RQ9XwXCT/EgL9m5uYRR31hbufRp4z32z//hvRIeB4a7owGSSk0mfB+d/1L I1LfChPlkKI5h/74h694V3hiA51nuMQ= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1666257860; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=OUN55/ABvueJSHYe57Gyyi3U946xUUVCYo+DLFQoHBo=; b=1SycdDGv0PxFebU9lUXvXmuSkIwZ4lKS0v9XgSe10W6PW3vpSBlPAzgOIPnpC3E/NEXQGP 5qA90HSC+eeGZGINXrjf2LT7x1frLZo7LN8jNJCuPbYsiybfvh6SBUPkqQ6L9qoNWeCt5N e53OuKZ2t/KL7S3r9vM6QsYrypF1Byo= Authentication-Results: imf08.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (imf08.hostedemail.com: domain of baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com designates 115.124.30.54 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=alibaba.com X-Stat-Signature: eqmat84ap9rogbg5poyc3xcqe4x6hj44 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: B482716003B X-Rspamd-Server: rspam02 X-Rspam-User: X-HE-Tag: 1666257858-125347 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 10/20/2022 4:15 PM, Huang, Ying wrote: > Baolin Wang writes: > >> The migrate_pages() will return the number of {normal page, THP, hugetlb} >> that were not migrated, or an error code. That means it can still return >> the number of failure count, though the pages have been migrated >> successfully with several times re-try. > > If my understanding were correct, if pages are migrated successfully > after several times re-tries, the return value will be 0. There's one > possibility for migrate_pages() to return non-zero but all pages are > migrated. That is, when THP is split and all subpages are migrated > successfully. Yeah, that's the case I tested. Thanks for pointing out. I'll re-write my incorrect commit message next time. > >> So we should not use the return value of migrate_pages() to determin >> if there are pages are failed to migrate. Instead we can validate the >> 'movable_page_list' to see if there are pages remained in the list, >> which are failed to migrate. That can mitigate the failure of longterm >> pinning. > > Another choice is to use a special return value for split THP + success > migration. But I'm fine to use list_empty(return_pages). OK. Using list_empty(return_pages) looks more simple. > >> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang >> --- >> mm/gup.c | 7 ++++--- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c >> index 5182aba..bd8cfcd 100644 >> --- a/mm/gup.c >> +++ b/mm/gup.c >> @@ -1914,9 +1914,10 @@ static int migrate_longterm_unpinnable_pages( >> .gfp_mask = GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN, >> }; >> >> - if (migrate_pages(movable_page_list, alloc_migration_target, >> - NULL, (unsigned long)&mtc, MIGRATE_SYNC, >> - MR_LONGTERM_PIN, NULL)) { >> + ret = migrate_pages(movable_page_list, alloc_migration_target, >> + NULL, (unsigned long)&mtc, MIGRATE_SYNC, >> + MR_LONGTERM_PIN, NULL); >> + if (ret < 0 || !list_empty(movable_page_list)) { > > It seems that !list_empty() is sufficient here. OK. Drop the 'ret < 0' >> ret = -ENOMEM; > > Why change the error code? I don't think it's a good idea to do that. The GUP need a -errno for failure or partial success when migration, and we can not return the number of pages failed to migrate. So returning -ENOMEM seems suitable for both cases?