linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Zhenhua Huang <quic_zhenhuah@quicinc.com>,
	anshuman.khandual@arm.com, will@kernel.org, ardb@kernel.org,
	ryan.roberts@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, joey.gouly@arm.com,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	chenfeiyang@loongson.cn, chenhuacai@kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, quic_tingweiz@quicinc.com,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] arm64: mm: Populate vmemmap/linear at the page level for hotplugged sections
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 17:16:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b2964ea1-a22c-4b66-89ef-3082b6d00d21@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z64UcwSGQ53mFmWF@arm.com>

On 13.02.25 16:49, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 01:59:25PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 13.02.25 08:57, Zhenhua Huang wrote:
>>> On the arm64 platform with 4K base page config, SECTION_SIZE_BITS is set
>>> to 27, making one section 128M. The related page struct which vmemmap
>>> points to is 2M then.
>>> Commit c1cc1552616d ("arm64: MMU initialisation") optimizes the
>>> vmemmap to populate at the PMD section level which was suitable
>>> initially since hot plug granule is always one section(128M). However,
>>> commit ba72b4c8cf60 ("mm/sparsemem: support sub-section hotplug")
>>> introduced a 2M(SUBSECTION_SIZE) hot plug granule, which disrupted the
>>> existing arm64 assumptions.
>>>
>>> Considering the vmemmap_free -> unmap_hotplug_pmd_range path, when
>>> pmd_sect() is true, the entire PMD section is cleared, even if there is
>>> other effective subsection. For example page_struct_map1 and
>>> page_strcut_map2 are part of a single PMD entry and they are hot-added
>>> sequentially. Then page_struct_map1 is removed, vmemmap_free() will clear
>>> the entire PMD entry freeing the struct page map for the whole section,
>>> even though page_struct_map2 is still active. Similar problem exists
>>> with linear mapping as well, for 16K base page(PMD size = 32M) or 64K
>>> base page(PMD = 512M), their block mappings exceed SUBSECTION_SIZE.
>>> Tearing down the entire PMD mapping too will leave other subsections
>>> unmapped in the linear mapping.
>>>
>>> To address the issue, we need to prevent PMD/PUD/CONT mappings for both
>>> linear and vmemmap for non-boot sections if corresponding size on the
>>> given base page exceeds SUBSECTION_SIZE(2MB now).
>>>
>>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.4+
>>> Fixes: ba72b4c8cf60 ("mm/sparsemem: support sub-section hotplug")
>>> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zhenhua Huang <quic_zhenhuah@quicinc.com>
>>
>> Just so I understand correctly: for ordinary memory-sections-size hotplug
>> (NVDIMM, virtio-mem), we still get a large mapping where possible?
> 
> Up to 2MB blocks only since that's the SUBSECTION_SIZE value. The
> vmemmap mapping is also limited to PAGE_SIZE mappings (we could use
> contiguous mappings for vmemmap but it's not wired up; I don't think
> it's worth the hassle).

But that's messed up, no?

If someone hotplugs a memory section, they have to hotunplug a memory 
section, not parts of it.

That's why x86 does in vmemmap_populate():

if (end - start < PAGES_PER_SECTION * sizeof(struct page))
	err = vmemmap_populate_basepages(start, end, node, NULL);
else if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PSE))
	err = vmemmap_populate_hugepages(start, end, node, altmap);
...

Maybe I'm missing something. Most importantly, why the weird subsection 
stuff is supposed to degrade ordinary hotplug of dimms/virtio-mem etc.

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb



  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-13 16:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-13  7:57 Zhenhua Huang
2025-02-13 12:59 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-13 15:49   ` Catalin Marinas
2025-02-13 16:16     ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2025-02-13 17:56       ` Catalin Marinas
2025-02-13 18:20         ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-14  9:46           ` Zhenhua Huang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b2964ea1-a22c-4b66-89ef-3082b6d00d21@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=chenfeiyang@loongson.cn \
    --cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=quic_tingweiz@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_zhenhuah@quicinc.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox