linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
To: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sony.com>,
	Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] lib/test_vmalloc.c: Allow built-in execution
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 19:53:37 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b28374e1-a387-4a2c-8986-02cd5081a8ab@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aEwzcsDM2PPsx1h-@pc636>


On 13/06/25 7:49 pm, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> Hello, Dev!
>
>> On 17/04/25 9:42 pm, Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) wrote:
>>> This patch removes the dependency on module loading ("m")
>>> for the vmalloc test suite, enabling it to be built directly
>>> into the kernel, so both ("=m") and ("=y") are supported.
>>>
>>> Motivation:
>>> - Faster debugging/testing of vmalloc code;
>>> - It allows to configure the test via kernel-boot parameters.
>>>
>>> Configuration example:
>>>     test_vmalloc.nr_threads=64
>>>     test_vmalloc.run_test_mask=7
>>>     test_vmalloc.sequential_test_order=1
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>>    lib/Kconfig.debug  | 3 +--
>>>    lib/test_vmalloc.c | 5 +++--
>>>    2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
>>> index f9051ab610d54..166b9d830a85a 100644
>>> --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
>>> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
>>> @@ -2574,8 +2574,7 @@ config TEST_BITOPS
>>>    config TEST_VMALLOC
>>>    	tristate "Test module for stress/performance analysis of vmalloc allocator"
>>>    	default n
>>> -       depends on MMU
>>> -	depends on m
>>> +	depends on MMU
>>>    	help
>>>    	  This builds the "test_vmalloc" module that should be used for
>>>    	  stress and performance analysis. So, any new change for vmalloc
>>> diff --git a/lib/test_vmalloc.c b/lib/test_vmalloc.c
>>> index 4ab23e5e772d0..6d65ef725d42c 100644
>>> --- a/lib/test_vmalloc.c
>>> +++ b/lib/test_vmalloc.c
>>> @@ -591,10 +591,11 @@ static void do_concurrent_test(void)
>>>    	kvfree(tdriver);
>>>    }
>>> -static int vmalloc_test_init(void)
>>> +static int __init vmalloc_test_init(void)
>>>    {
>>>    	do_concurrent_test();
>>> -	return -EAGAIN; /* Fail will directly unload the module */
>>> +	/* Fail will directly unload the module */
>>> +	return IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_TEST_VMALLOC) ? 0:-EAGAIN;
>>>    }
>>>    module_init(vmalloc_test_init)
>> Hi Uladzislau,
>>
>> Post this patch I am seeing the following problem: while booting the kernel, this test is
>> executed and a particular testcase triggers a warning splat from the kernel, then the boot
>> gets stuck for 3-4 seconds, then proceeds. I am not an expert on modules so I don't know
>> what happened but I am guessing that when the test fails, the delay is due to module
>> unloading time...do you suggest a solution? I reverted your patch and then proceeded with
>> my work, so apologies for not having the dmesg log, if you need it I'll replicate, although
>> there is some subtest which has consistently been spitting out a warning on my Apple M3 Linux
>> VM and I have been just ignoring it for long : )
>>
> This is because CONFIG_TEST_VMALLOC=y is built-in in your case.

Actually, I have a usecase for test_vmalloc :) I wanted to test my
patches through the test, but the problem is that the moment it fails,
it gets unloaded and then I cannot use the test at runtime. Currently it
is set to =m in my .config.

> Therefore the tests are triggered including the ones which generates
> kernel warnings, which is expectable. It takes some time to execute,
> therefore you see a delay.
>
> By default the CONFIG_TEST_VMALLOC is not set. This is just for
> debugging purpose. Please unset it in your kernel configuration.
> It is located under:
>
> Kernel Hacking
>    Kernel Testing and Coverage
>      Runtime Testing
>         Test Module for stress/performance analysis of vmalloc allocator
>
> --
> Uladzislau Rezki


  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-13 14:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-17 16:12 [PATCH 1/4] lib/test_vmalloc.c: Replace RWSEM to SRCU for setup Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-04-17 16:12 ` [PATCH 2/4] lib/test_vmalloc.c: Allow built-in execution Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-04-18 15:01   ` Baoquan He
2025-04-24 13:37   ` Adrian Huang12
2025-06-13 13:59   ` Dev Jain
2025-06-13 14:19     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-06-13 14:23       ` Dev Jain [this message]
2025-06-13 14:37         ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-06-14 10:27           ` Dev Jain
2025-06-14 15:35             ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-04-17 16:12 ` [PATCH 3/4] MAINTAINERS: Add test_vmalloc.c to VMALLOC section Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-04-18 15:01   ` Baoquan He
2025-04-17 16:12 ` [PATCH 4/4] vmalloc: Align nr_vmalloc_pages and vmap_lazy_nr Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-04-18 13:26   ` Baoquan He
2025-04-24 13:38   ` Adrian Huang12
2025-04-18 18:12 ` [PATCH 1/4] lib/test_vmalloc.c: Replace RWSEM to SRCU for setup kernel test robot
2025-04-22 12:59   ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-04-24 13:35 ` Adrian Huang12

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b28374e1-a387-4a2c-8986-02cd5081a8ab@arm.com \
    --to=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=oleksiy.avramchenko@sony.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox