From: "Stefan Roesch" <shr@devkernel.io>
To: "David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>, kernel-team@fb.com
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, riel@surriel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] mm/ksm: add ksm advisor
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 10:32:39 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b26fe1a4-1689-4640-a277-b1363453e0aa@app.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9f81f89f-c3ad-4cef-a619-ad36348c8ef5@redhat.com>
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023, at 5:44 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> [...]
>
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * struct advisor_ctx - metadata for KSM advisor
>> + * @start_scan: start time of the current scan
>> + * @scan_time: scan time of previous scan
>> + * @change: change in percent to pages_to_scan parameter
>> + * @cpu_time: cpu time consumed by the ksmd thread in the previous scan
>> + */
>> +struct advisor_ctx {
>> + ktime_t start_scan;
>> + unsigned long scan_time;
>> + unsigned long change;
>> + unsigned long long cpu_time;
>> +};
>> +static struct advisor_ctx advisor_ctx;
>> +
>> +/* Define different advisor's */
>> +enum ksm_advisor_type {
>> + KSM_ADVISOR_NONE,
>> + KSM_ADVISOR_SCAN_TIME,
>> +};
>> +static enum ksm_advisor_type ksm_advisor;
>> +
>> +static void init_advisor(void)
>> +{
>> + advisor_ctx = (const struct advisor_ctx){ 0 };
>> +}
>
> Again, you can drop this completely. The static values are already
> initialized to 0.
>
It is needed for patch 2, I folded it into set_advisor_defaults
> Or is there any reason to initialize to 0 explicitly?
>
>> +
>> +static void set_advisor_defaults(void)
>> +{
>> + if (ksm_advisor == KSM_ADVISOR_NONE)
>> + ksm_thread_pages_to_scan = DEFAULT_PAGES_TO_SCAN;
>> + else if (ksm_advisor == KSM_ADVISOR_SCAN_TIME)
>> + ksm_thread_pages_to_scan = ksm_advisor_min_pages;
>> +}
>
> That function is unused?
>
I think you already saw it, it is used in patch 2, moving the function to patch 2.
>> +
>> +static inline void advisor_start_scan(void)
>> +{
>> + if (ksm_advisor == KSM_ADVISOR_SCAN_TIME)
>> + advisor_ctx.start_scan = ktime_get();
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline s64 advisor_stop_scan(void)
>> +{
>> + return ktime_ms_delta(ktime_get(), advisor_ctx.start_scan);
>> +}
>
> Just inline that into the caller. Then rename run_advisor() into
> advisor_stop_scan(). So in scan_get_next_rmap_item)( you have paired
> start+stop hooks.
>
The next version has this change.
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Use previous scan time if available, otherwise use current scan time as an
>> + * approximation for the previous scan time.
>> + */
>> +static inline unsigned long prev_scan_time(struct advisor_ctx *ctx,
>> + unsigned long scan_time)
>> +{
>> + return ctx->scan_time ? ctx->scan_time : scan_time;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Calculate exponential weighted moving average */
>> +static unsigned long ewma(unsigned long prev, unsigned long curr)
>> +{
>> + return ((100 - EWMA_WEIGHT) * prev + EWMA_WEIGHT * curr) / 100;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * The scan time advisor is based on the current scan rate and the target
>> + * scan rate.
>> + *
>> + * new_pages_to_scan = pages_to_scan * (scan_time / target_scan_time)
>> + *
>> + * To avoid pertubations it calculates a change factor of previous changes.
>
> s/pertubations/perturbations/
Fixed.
>
> Do you also want to describe how min/max CPU comes into play?
>
I added additional documentation for it in the next version of the patch.
>> + * A new change factor is calculated for each iteration and it uses an
>> + * exponentially weighted moving average. The new pages_to_scan value is
>> + * multiplied with that change factor:
>> + *
>> + * new_pages_to_scan *= change facor
>> + *
>> + * In addition the new pages_to_scan value is capped by the max and min
>> + * limits.
>> + */
>
>
>
> With that, LGTM
>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-12 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-04 23:49 [PATCH v3 0/4] mm/ksm: Add " Stefan Roesch
2023-12-04 23:49 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] mm/ksm: add " Stefan Roesch
2023-12-06 15:17 ` kernel test robot
2023-12-12 13:44 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-12-12 18:32 ` Stefan Roesch [this message]
2023-12-04 23:49 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] mm/ksm: add sysfs knobs for advisor Stefan Roesch
2023-12-12 13:45 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-12-12 18:02 ` Stefan Roesch
2023-12-12 18:07 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-12-12 18:27 ` Stefan Roesch
2023-12-04 23:49 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] mm/ksm: add tracepoint for ksm advisor Stefan Roesch
2023-12-12 13:45 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-12-04 23:49 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] mm/ksm: document ksm advisor and its sysfs knobs Stefan Roesch
2023-12-12 13:46 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-12-05 20:46 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] mm/ksm: Add ksm advisor Andrew Morton
2023-12-07 23:18 ` Stefan Roesch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b26fe1a4-1689-4640-a277-b1363453e0aa@app.fastmail.com \
--to=shr@devkernel.io \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox