linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/13] mm/debug_vm_pgtable/set_pte/pmd/pud: Don't use set_*_at to update an existing pte entry
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 16:32:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b21d1dbb-7439-d317-8516-94c80f333e92@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200819130107.478414-8-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>



Le 19/08/2020 à 15:01, Aneesh Kumar K.V a écrit :
> set_pte_at() should not be used to set a pte entry at locations that
> already holds a valid pte entry. Architectures like ppc64 don't do TLB
> invalidate in set_pte_at() and hence expect it to be used to set locations
> that are not a valid PTE.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>   mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c | 35 +++++++++++++++--------------------
>   1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
> index 76f4c713e5a3..9c7e2c9cfc76 100644
> --- a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
> +++ b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
> @@ -74,15 +74,18 @@ static void __init pte_advanced_tests(struct mm_struct *mm,
>   {
>   	pte_t pte = pfn_pte(pfn, prot);
>   
> +	/*
> +	 * Architectures optimize set_pte_at by avoiding TLB flush.
> +	 * This requires set_pte_at to be not used to update an
> +	 * existing pte entry. Clear pte before we do set_pte_at
> +	 */
> +
>   	pr_debug("Validating PTE advanced\n");
>   	pte = pfn_pte(pfn, prot);
>   	set_pte_at(mm, vaddr, ptep, pte);
>   	ptep_set_wrprotect(mm, vaddr, ptep);
>   	pte = ptep_get(ptep);
>   	WARN_ON(pte_write(pte));
> -
> -	pte = pfn_pte(pfn, prot);
> -	set_pte_at(mm, vaddr, ptep, pte);
>   	ptep_get_and_clear(mm, vaddr, ptep);
>   	pte = ptep_get(ptep);
>   	WARN_ON(!pte_none(pte));
> @@ -96,13 +99,11 @@ static void __init pte_advanced_tests(struct mm_struct *mm,
>   	ptep_set_access_flags(vma, vaddr, ptep, pte, 1);
>   	pte = ptep_get(ptep);
>   	WARN_ON(!(pte_write(pte) && pte_dirty(pte)));
> -
> -	pte = pfn_pte(pfn, prot);
> -	set_pte_at(mm, vaddr, ptep, pte);
>   	ptep_get_and_clear_full(mm, vaddr, ptep, 1);
>   	pte = ptep_get(ptep);
>   	WARN_ON(!pte_none(pte));
>   
> +	pte = pfn_pte(pfn, prot);
>   	pte = pte_mkyoung(pte);
>   	set_pte_at(mm, vaddr, ptep, pte);
>   	ptep_test_and_clear_young(vma, vaddr, ptep);
> @@ -164,9 +165,6 @@ static void __init pmd_advanced_tests(struct mm_struct *mm,
>   	pmdp_set_wrprotect(mm, vaddr, pmdp);
>   	pmd = READ_ONCE(*pmdp);
>   	WARN_ON(pmd_write(pmd));
> -
> -	pmd = pmd_mkhuge(pfn_pmd(pfn, prot));
> -	set_pmd_at(mm, vaddr, pmdp, pmd);
>   	pmdp_huge_get_and_clear(mm, vaddr, pmdp);
>   	pmd = READ_ONCE(*pmdp);
>   	WARN_ON(!pmd_none(pmd));
> @@ -180,13 +178,11 @@ static void __init pmd_advanced_tests(struct mm_struct *mm,
>   	pmdp_set_access_flags(vma, vaddr, pmdp, pmd, 1);
>   	pmd = READ_ONCE(*pmdp);
>   	WARN_ON(!(pmd_write(pmd) && pmd_dirty(pmd)));
> -
> -	pmd = pmd_mkhuge(pfn_pmd(pfn, prot));
> -	set_pmd_at(mm, vaddr, pmdp, pmd);
>   	pmdp_huge_get_and_clear_full(vma, vaddr, pmdp, 1);
>   	pmd = READ_ONCE(*pmdp);
>   	WARN_ON(!pmd_none(pmd));
>   
> +	pmd = pmd_mkhuge(pfn_pmd(pfn, prot));
>   	pmd = pmd_mkyoung(pmd);
>   	set_pmd_at(mm, vaddr, pmdp, pmd);
>   	pmdp_test_and_clear_young(vma, vaddr, pmdp);
> @@ -283,18 +279,10 @@ static void __init pud_advanced_tests(struct mm_struct *mm,
>   	WARN_ON(pud_write(pud));
>   
>   #ifndef __PAGETABLE_PMD_FOLDED

Same as below, once set_put_at() is gone, I don't think this #ifndef 
__PAGETABLE_PMD_FOLDED is still need, should be possible to replace by 
'if (mm_pmd_folded())'

> -
> -	pud = pud_mkhuge(pfn_pud(pfn, prot));
> -	set_pud_at(mm, vaddr, pudp, pud);
>   	pudp_huge_get_and_clear(mm, vaddr, pudp);
>   	pud = READ_ONCE(*pudp);
>   	WARN_ON(!pud_none(pud));
>   
> -	pud = pud_mkhuge(pfn_pud(pfn, prot));
> -	set_pud_at(mm, vaddr, pudp, pud);
> -	pudp_huge_get_and_clear_full(mm, vaddr, pudp, 1);
> -	pud = READ_ONCE(*pudp);
> -	WARN_ON(!pud_none(pud));
>   #endif /* __PAGETABLE_PMD_FOLDED */
>   
>   	pud = pud_mkhuge(pfn_pud(pfn, prot));
> @@ -307,6 +295,13 @@ static void __init pud_advanced_tests(struct mm_struct *mm,
>   	pud = READ_ONCE(*pudp);
>   	WARN_ON(!(pud_write(pud) && pud_dirty(pud)));
>   
> +#ifndef __PAGETABLE_PMD_FOLDED
> +	pudp_huge_get_and_clear_full(vma, vaddr, pudp, 1);
> +	pud = READ_ONCE(*pudp);
> +	WARN_ON(!pud_none(pud));
> +#endif /* __PAGETABLE_PMD_FOLDED */

pudp_huge_get_and_clear_full() and pud_none() are always defined, I 
think this #ifndef can be replaced by an 'if (mm_pmd_folded())'

> +
> +	pud = pud_mkhuge(pfn_pud(pfn, prot));
>   	pud = pud_mkyoung(pud);
>   	set_pud_at(mm, vaddr, pudp, pud);
>   	pudp_test_and_clear_young(vma, vaddr, pudp);
> 

Christophe


  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-20 14:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-19 13:00 [PATCH v2 00/13] mm/debug_vm_pgtable fixes Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-19 13:00 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] powerpc/mm: Add DEBUG_VM WARN for pmd_clear Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-19 13:00 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] powerpc/mm: Move setting pte specific flags to pfn_pte Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-19 13:00 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] mm/debug_vm_pgtable/ppc64: Avoid setting top bits in radom value Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-19 13:00 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] mm/debug_vm_pgtables/hugevmap: Use the arch helper to identify huge vmap support Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-19 16:29   ` kernel test robot
2020-08-20  5:31     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-21  8:38   ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-08-19 13:00 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] mm/debug_vm_pgtable/savedwrite: Enable savedwrite test with CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-19 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] mm/debug_vm_pgtable/THP: Mark the pte entry huge before using set_pmd/pud_at Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-19 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] mm/debug_vm_pgtable/set_pte/pmd/pud: Don't use set_*_at to update an existing pte entry Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-20 14:32   ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
2020-08-21  7:14     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-21  8:20       ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-08-19 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] mm/debug_vm_pgtable/thp: Use page table depost/withdraw with THP Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-19 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] mm/debug_vm_pgtable/locks: Move non page table modifying test together Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-19 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] mm/debug_vm_pgtable/locks: Take correct page table lock Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-21  8:03   ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-08-21  8:08     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-19 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] mm/debug_vm_pgtable/pmd_clear: Don't use pmd/pud_clear on pte entries Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-19 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] mm/debug_vm_pgtable/hugetlb: Disable hugetlb test on ppc64 Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-19 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: populate a pte entry before fetching it Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-19 13:45 ` [PATCH v2 00/13] mm/debug_vm_pgtable fixes Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-21  3:33   ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-08-21  4:20     ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-08-21  6:53     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-21  8:01       ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-08-21  8:10         ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-21  8:50           ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-21  9:09             ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-08-21  8:51 ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-09-01  8:03   ` Christophe Leroy
2020-09-01  9:11     ` Anshuman Khandual

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b21d1dbb-7439-d317-8516-94c80f333e92@csgroup.eu \
    --to=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox