From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DF4AC433EF for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 12:25:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id DC6B08D0002; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 08:25:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id D4D648D0001; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 08:25:56 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id BC85C8D0002; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 08:25:56 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0012.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.12]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AACB28D0001 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 08:25:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin09.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay06.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C42635303 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 12:25:56 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79551361512.09.7DDE5DC Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by imf20.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E0E61C0060 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 12:25:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1654604755; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Mf4QQ8b/9HcGL5J+sznsLy7f+ZtpXa7DM56pD/5wHRY=; b=ePHgBTlBOefbGeEQuHWS2/flXyQ2tldjT1AdwZhWVEf5nVZwTMbW5Tdm223ss024kqJQ8J qTvZvDd5wK14fmbXbDhFnNJksmAu/DI4xykdunxcwPxxq5FufSP6gJxrOq5/bbyG8f4Crz d8d1n9ro/7sZvHeoKFhY59DDrslTGg8= Received: from mail-wr1-f71.google.com (mail-wr1-f71.google.com [209.85.221.71]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-216-VZ6QroZnMfGeOOAqwTDUdw-1; Tue, 07 Jun 2022 08:25:52 -0400 X-MC-Unique: VZ6QroZnMfGeOOAqwTDUdw-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f71.google.com with SMTP id c16-20020a5d4cd0000000b00213b1d4a96cso3264775wrt.1 for ; Tue, 07 Jun 2022 05:25:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:organization:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Mf4QQ8b/9HcGL5J+sznsLy7f+ZtpXa7DM56pD/5wHRY=; b=Jr9ilwC3/wz10lUjOIaHwX6ziRywfNvKlYVVRwTcC+bgCdMkPhWeVAEoWh4hDtoGOS QIQa5GSDnQTydDA1Ag14r/+KyD+h4UiGxE8vbYMhdD8BatEdZGHjxBcAsLbA0hT4x3AJ jDhqR/pW3yVQHlsLtpqn+dIQtEOjnYESl1WFXW9odJ4KFo6oxdJv27FiU22Z3OCQPJtd i4Cd06Y3KObTHc2LU67kS4ac4ccMl4CjvgmVrWC6Z8zIo4Oi+FyFea5PmrnSq16YV5yC ywswvhZQSYX4tKA29XAkdQDWqJ5iA0ap0+OmxgoL7yFQKpP0Kawxl8Mp92DScRBmazlr +Gpg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530415keqj+PvHq27RNWrvagDZh8O84cUFAo8RqxVcvQZnBPgkd+ +QqDbKS6+4+qM2RhcZDH+9/2Fv0c1TGa4eyzGlEqTQ8MbjvPMLmb8qaLxcw365F0zPDkDrwkIpd +zJ2j1WiwgVM= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:190d:b0:394:8241:6454 with SMTP id j13-20020a05600c190d00b0039482416454mr29078126wmq.198.1654604751362; Tue, 07 Jun 2022 05:25:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxEuwOaCR67pR222FFFc/vDtB6DVVouzt2vgnHsRtqi2r3pc13yypWYxPfO2mRuKCd4JmPjUQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:190d:b0:394:8241:6454 with SMTP id j13-20020a05600c190d00b0039482416454mr29078055wmq.198.1654604751070; Tue, 07 Jun 2022 05:25:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2003:cb:c709:500:4c8d:4886:f874:7b6f? (p200300cbc70905004c8d4886f8747b6f.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:cb:c709:500:4c8d:4886:f874:7b6f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m19-20020a05600c4f5300b003942a244f2esm26245306wmq.7.2022.06.07.05.25.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 07 Jun 2022 05:25:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 14:25:47 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] mm: Demote warning message in vmemmap_verify() to debug level To: Wupeng Ma , corbet@lwn.net, will@kernel.org, ardb@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, dvhart@infradead.org, andy@infradead.org, rppt@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, paulmck@kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org, songmuchun@bytedance.com, rdunlap@infradead.org, damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com, swboyd@chromium.org, wei.liu@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com, thunder.leizhen@huawei.com, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, gpiccoli@igalia.com, chenhuacai@kernel.org, geert@linux-m68k.org, chenzhou10@huawei.com, vijayb@linux.microsoft.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org References: <20220607093805.1354256-1-mawupeng1@huawei.com> <20220607093805.1354256-5-mawupeng1@huawei.com> From: David Hildenbrand Organization: Red Hat In-Reply-To: <20220607093805.1354256-5-mawupeng1@huawei.com> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Server: rspam07 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 1E0E61C0060 X-Stat-Signature: anbfqf47gfmmz4g7xxaa9hpookznn4ja X-Rspam-User: Authentication-Results: imf20.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=ePHgBTlB; spf=none (imf20.hostedemail.com: domain of david@redhat.com has no SPF policy when checking 170.10.133.124) smtp.mailfrom=david@redhat.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=redhat.com X-HE-Tag: 1654604734-232852 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 07.06.22 11:38, Wupeng Ma wrote: > From: Ma Wupeng > > For a system only have limited mirrored memory or some numa node without > mirrored memory, the per node vmemmap page_structs prefer to allocate > memory from mirrored region, which will lead to vmemmap_verify() in > vmemmap_populate_basepages() report lots of warning message. > > This patch demote the "potential offnode page_structs" warning messages > to debug level to avoid a very long print during bootup. > > Signed-off-by: Ma Wupeng > --- > mm/sparse-vmemmap.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c > index f4fa61dbbee3..78debdb89eb1 100644 > --- a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c > +++ b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c > @@ -528,7 +528,7 @@ void __meminit vmemmap_verify(pte_t *pte, int node, > int actual_node = early_pfn_to_nid(pfn); > > if (node_distance(actual_node, node) > LOCAL_DISTANCE) > - pr_warn("[%lx-%lx] potential offnode page_structs\n", > + pr_debug("[%lx-%lx] potential offnode page_structs\n", > start, end - 1); > } > This will possibly hide it in environments where this might indeed indicate performance issues. What about a pr_warn_once()? -- Thanks, David / dhildenb