From: "Gupta, Pankaj" <pankaj.gupta@amd.com>
To: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Virtual Machine Memory Passthrough
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 18:08:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b079ff5c-0ded-1ed6-15ed-603972ac23b4@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+CK2bDr5Xii021JBXeyCEY4jjWCsZQ=ENa-s8MLkBv5hYUvsA@mail.gmail.com>
> Hello,
>
> As a part of an ongoing work of replacing some containerized work load
> with virtual machines within Google, I have worked on making the
> memory translations faster.
>
> I would like to propose the following topic for this year's LSF/MM/BPF:
>
> Discuss a set of techniques that can improve the guest performance,
> memory footprint overhead, observability, and manageability of virtual
> machines by hypervirtualizing the guest memory to the extreme. The end
> goal is to allow very lightweight virtual machines to be closer in
> performance to the containers.
>
> The following items are going to be discussed in this topic:
> - Reducing the cost of SLAT page table translations.
> - Reducing the memory footprint overhead.
Coming from the virtio-pmem and some free page hinting background, I am
interested in this discussion. I saw your proposal about single owner
memory driver in other thread and could not entirely link the dots about
applicability of the idea with "reducing the memory footprint overhead
for virtual machines". Do we plan to co-ordinate guest memory state with
corresponding host state for efficient memory reclaim decisions?
Or something entirely different we are targeting here?
Thanks,
Pankaj
> - Reducing the memory management overhead.
> - Increasing the observability of guest memory.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-22 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-20 16:31 Pasha Tatashin
2023-02-20 23:51 ` Gavin Shan
2023-02-22 13:43 ` Pasha Tatashin
2023-02-22 15:31 ` Zi Yan
2023-02-22 15:43 ` Pasha Tatashin
2023-02-21 4:38 ` Zhu Yanjun
2023-02-22 13:44 ` Pasha Tatashin
2023-02-22 17:08 ` Gupta, Pankaj [this message]
2023-02-22 18:18 ` Pasha Tatashin
2023-02-22 20:27 ` Gupta, Pankaj
2023-02-22 20:56 ` Pasha Tatashin
2023-02-23 9:11 ` Gupta, Pankaj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b079ff5c-0ded-1ed6-15ed-603972ac23b4@amd.com \
--to=pankaj.gupta@amd.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox