From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
willy@infradead.org, hch@lst.de, dave@stgolabs.net,
david@fromorbit.com, djwong@kernel.org
Cc: john.g.garry@oracle.com, ritesh.list@gmail.com,
kbusch@kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, gost.dev@samsung.com,
p.raghav@samsung.com, da.gomez@samsung.com,
kernel@pankajraghav.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 03/11] fs/buffer: add iteration support for block_read_full_folio()
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 11:00:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b05cb512-16f9-4249-93c2-4f2d44213f7f@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241214031050.1337920-4-mcgrof@kernel.org>
On 12/14/24 04:10, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> Provide a helper to iterate on buffer heads on a folio. We do this
> as a preliminary step so to make the subsequent changes easier to
> read. Right now we use an array on stack to loop over all buffer heads
> in a folio of size MAX_BUF_PER_PAGE, however on CPUs where the system
> page size is quite larger like Hexagon with 256 KiB page size support
> this can mean the kernel can end up spewing spews stack growth
> warnings.
>
> To be able to break this down into smaller array chunks add support for
> processing smaller array chunks of buffer heads at a time. The used
> array size is not changed yet, that will be done in a subsequent patch,
> this just adds the iterator support and logic.
>
> While at it clarify the booleans used on bh_read_batch_async() and
> how they are only valid in consideration when we've processed all
> buffer-heads of a folio, that is when we're on the last buffer head in
> a folio:
>
> * bh_folio_reads
> * unmapped
>
> Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
> ---
> fs/buffer.c | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 94 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-17 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-14 3:10 [RFC v2 00/11] enable bs > ps for block devices Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-14 3:10 ` [RFC v2 01/11] fs/buffer: move async batch read code into a helper Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-17 9:56 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-12-14 3:10 ` [RFC v2 02/11] fs/buffer: add a for_each_bh() for block_read_full_folio() Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-14 4:02 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-12-16 18:56 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-16 20:05 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-16 21:46 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-17 8:46 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-17 9:57 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-12-14 3:10 ` [RFC v2 03/11] fs/buffer: add iteration support " Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-17 10:00 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2024-12-14 3:10 ` [RFC v2 04/11] fs/buffer: reduce stack usage on bh_read_iter() Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-17 10:04 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-12-14 3:10 ` [RFC v2 05/11] fs/mpage: use blocks_per_folio instead of blocks_per_page Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-14 4:46 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-12-14 3:10 ` [RFC v2 06/11] fs/mpage: avoid negative shift for large blocksize Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-14 3:10 ` [RFC v2 07/11] fs/buffer fs/mpage: remove large folio restriction Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-14 3:10 ` [RFC v2 08/11] block/bdev: enable large folio support for large logical block sizes Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-14 3:10 ` [RFC v2 09/11] block/bdev: lift block size restrictions and use common definition Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-16 8:55 ` John Garry
2024-12-16 9:19 ` Ming Lei
2024-12-16 10:13 ` John Garry
2024-12-16 10:23 ` Ming Lei
2024-12-17 20:51 ` John Garry
2024-12-17 10:05 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-12-17 21:00 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-12-14 3:10 ` [RFC v2 10/11] nvme: remove superfluous block size check Luis Chamberlain
2024-12-15 0:39 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-12-14 3:10 ` [RFC v2 11/11] bdev: use bdev_io_min() for statx block size Luis Chamberlain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b05cb512-16f9-4249-93c2-4f2d44213f7f@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=da.gomez@samsung.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@pankajraghav.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=p.raghav@samsung.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox