From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Make alloc_contig_range handle Hugetlb pages
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 10:43:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b04aaf5534f9ec0a40937e23a2500fdf@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c7ba5bba-77fb-6c43-2067-2ebc83b014da@redhat.com>
On 2021-03-15 10:06, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> BTW, I stumbled yesterday over
>
> alloc_contig_pages()->pfn_range_valid_contig():
>
> if (page_count(page) > 0)
> rerurn false;
> if (PageHuge(page))
> return false;
>
> As used by memtrace and for gigantic pages. We can now
>
> a) Drop these check completely, as it's best-effort only and racy.
> alloc_contig_pages()/alloc_contig_range() will handle it properly.
I was preparing v5, and I wanted to be sure I understood you here.
Right you are that the in-use page check can be dropped, as those pages
can
be migrated away, and the Hugetlb page check can also be dropped since
isolate_migratepages_range is now capable of dealing with those kind of
pages.
> b) Similarly, check for gigantic pages and/or movability/migratability.
I lost you here.
isolate_or_dissolve_huge_page() already bails out on hugetlb-gigantic
pages.
Or do you mean to place an upfront check here? (hstate_is_gigantic())?
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE L3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-17 9:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-10 15:08 Oscar Salvador
2021-03-10 15:08 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] mm,page_alloc: Bail out earlier on -ENOMEM in alloc_contig_migrate_range Oscar Salvador
2021-03-10 15:08 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] mm,compaction: Let isolate_migratepages_{range,block} return error codes Oscar Salvador
2021-03-10 15:08 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] mm: Make alloc_contig_range handle free hugetlb pages Oscar Salvador
[not found] ` <c7ba5bba-77fb-6c43-2067-2ebc83b014da@redhat.com>
2021-03-17 9:43 ` Oscar Salvador [this message]
2021-03-17 9:48 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] Make alloc_contig_range handle Hugetlb pages David Hildenbrand
2021-03-17 10:05 ` Oscar Salvador
2021-03-17 10:06 ` Oscar Salvador
2021-03-17 10:07 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b04aaf5534f9ec0a40937e23a2500fdf@suse.de \
--to=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox