From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-24.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ABB4C433E0 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 03:01:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16EFD22B2D for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 03:01:53 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 16EFD22B2D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 569386B0081; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 22:01:53 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 518B46B0082; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 22:01:53 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 42D918D0001; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 22:01:53 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0034.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.34]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B9BD6B0081 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 22:01:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin09.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E975F181AF5C3 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 03:01:52 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77619418464.09.drain66_36160c72745c Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin09.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2DB5180ACF62 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 03:01:52 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: drain66_36160c72745c X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 5528 Received: from mail-pl1-f177.google.com (mail-pl1-f177.google.com [209.85.214.177]) by imf02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 03:01:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pl1-f177.google.com with SMTP id r4so6667411pls.11 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 19:01:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=xZEe9nKbt22VK8Tq7L3dwCEv8d6KPrIVgCMxlhwxx3Q=; b=ToNIvWYMRuu67rHR26AoZ8LITvFFxwKDzFXUBeCMHNVl9SKWs2JiL/rESRW/P6aWJy K6uYZlQtdKrjpUypOhtUEmTbzBVZ1JnAbGM/S6YJMjCxSnF+nSUXZCn3KOFY2LvCS6yz yc7Ey0QONEBlbY7YFA13knO/pXtKTn6amSjABq3fNCUIvqUyZI1X2Z8kVdkrs0YKXy/X dEzx3hydhKrzU/EAU6oDiekbRHBwAXYr4n9POMB0yGtPsLSNA9+Be7PDY1SzMd5y2a+n 5SeCwkA5h823mfelQnl3wo05eq4v51qbunVKJ1C1tFvEVszIU8m/T2XG6s27myJXTfMl pMlQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=xZEe9nKbt22VK8Tq7L3dwCEv8d6KPrIVgCMxlhwxx3Q=; b=IHdqr5XYI1iL2m3NFJh61EfcTBSFoFMglxy9Ct9nTO2a+LP1UZR782+73OUgLGq+km 3d2zE998eHsRxq2F7G9eswG6XRvGq+zxp/7iJ9GSRSZzunHoieTIPIeGcY2TJKTVGXFK pFtCMg+LEvcEsl75BlIGKuDJPPt2/OqM804dvE9ORvjeKc6TROmC/cDsEB/zfGHkbtGz qlWKpR7fEhloML5cljpHW71kOZeeYZki+s2bDThQjVvSqyJb+ck2TcqD0QpzlEnMTkfd 8uFcX9PkINNnsajDr4VGg59+BkTesWmxNHFyjxXc6VucdaFkpfPBxqMd5Xx4NEDULf8S fLKg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533yEY2ecbKlCNzC+inXpD2iYcQUGSezpJMnYWsvDW3i41iqU5tp k42qhoUmq5HmFWbOGYwKQvGNfA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxQKMQbikVhTLg7WnCqu4OC1ZFMiEFMVD8hOqdAYJTeB8Tk5LqWtoWGAW9lEgvQaZgWv4IFDw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:d502:: with SMTP id t2mr19389131pju.131.1608606110682; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 19:01:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from eggly.attlocal.net (172-10-233-147.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [172.10.233.147]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t22sm17623091pgm.18.2020.12.21.19.01.49 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 21 Dec 2020 19:01:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 19:01:37 -0800 (PST) From: Hugh Dickins X-X-Sender: hugh@eggly.anvils To: Alex Shi cc: Andrew Morton , Hugh Dickins , Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko , Vladimir Davydov , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm/memcg: revise the using condition of lock_page_lruvec function series In-Reply-To: <1608186532-81218-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> Message-ID: References: <1608186532-81218-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (LSU 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu, 17 Dec 2020, Alex Shi wrote: > The series function could be used under lock_page_memcg(), add this and > a bit style changes following commit_charge(). > > Signed-off-by: Alex Shi > Cc: Hugh Dickins This patch, or its intention, Acked-by: Hugh Dickins but rewording suggested below, and requested above - which left me very puzzled before eventually I understood it. I don't think we need to talk about "a bit style changes", but the cross-reference to commit_charge() is helpful. " lock_page_lruvec() and its variants are safe to use under the same conditions as commit_charge(): add lock_page_memcg() to the comment. " > Cc: Johannes Weiner > Cc: Michal Hocko > Cc: Vladimir Davydov > Cc: Andrew Morton > Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > --- > mm/memcontrol.c | 9 +++++---- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c > index b80328f52fb4..e6b50d068b2f 100644 > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c > @@ -1345,10 +1345,11 @@ void lruvec_memcg_debug(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct page *page) > * lock_page_lruvec - lock and return lruvec for a given page. > * @page: the page > * > - * This series functions should be used in either conditions: > - * PageLRU is cleared or unset > - * or page->_refcount is zero > - * or page is locked. > + * This series functions should be used in any one of following conditions: These functions are safe to use under any of the following conditions: > + * - PageLRU is cleared or unset > + * - page->_refcount is zero > + * - page is locked. Remove that full stop... > + * - lock_page_memcg() ... and, if you wish (I don't care), add full stop at the end of that line. Maybe reorder those to the same order as listed in commit_charge(). Copy its text exactly? I don't think so, actually, I find your wording (e.g. _refcount is zero) more explicit: good to have both descriptions. > */ > struct lruvec *lock_page_lruvec(struct page *page) > { > -- > 2.29.GIT