From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
To: Vineeth Pillai <vpillai@digitalocean.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kelley Nielsen <kelleynnn@gmail.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] mm: rid swapoff of quadratic complexity
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2019 20:16:28 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1901012010440.13241@eggly.anvils> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANaguZAStuiXpk2S0rYwdn3Zzsoakavaps4RzSRVqMs3wZ49qg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 1 Jan 2019, Vineeth Pillai wrote:
> Thanks a lot for the fixes and detailed explanation Hugh! I shall fold all
> the changes from you and Huang in the next iteration.
>
> Thanks for all the suggestions and comments as well. I am looking into all
> those and will include all the changes in the next version. Will discuss
> over mail in case of any clarifications.
One more fix on top of what I sent yesterday: once I delved into
the retries, I found that the major cause of exceeding MAX_RETRIES
was the way the retry code neatly avoided retrying the last part of
its work. With this fix in, I have not yet seen retries go above 1:
no doubt it could, but at present I have no actual evidence that
the MAX_RETRIES-or-livelock issue needs to be dealt with urgently.
Fix sent for completeness, but it reinforces the point that the
structure of try_to_unuse() should be reworked, and oldi gone.
Hugh
---
mm/swapfile.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- mmotm/mm/swapfile.c 2018-12-31 12:30:55.822407154 -0800
+++ linux/mm/swapfile.c 2019-01-01 19:50:34.377277830 -0800
@@ -2107,8 +2107,8 @@ int try_to_unuse(unsigned int type, bool
struct swap_info_struct *si = swap_info[type];
struct page *page;
swp_entry_t entry;
- unsigned int i = 0;
- unsigned int oldi = 0;
+ unsigned int i;
+ unsigned int oldi;
int retries = 0;
if (!frontswap)
@@ -2154,6 +2154,7 @@ retry:
goto out;
}
+ i = oldi = 0;
while ((i = find_next_to_unuse(si, i, frontswap)) != 0) {
/*
* Under global memory pressure, swap entries
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-02 4:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-03 17:09 [PATCH v3 1/2] mm: Refactor swap-in logic out of shmem_getpage_gfp Vineeth Remanan Pillai
2018-12-03 17:09 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] mm: rid swapoff of quadratic complexity Vineeth Remanan Pillai
2019-01-01 0:44 ` Hugh Dickins
2019-01-01 0:44 ` Hugh Dickins
2019-01-01 18:24 ` Vineeth Pillai
2019-01-01 18:24 ` Vineeth Pillai
2019-01-02 4:16 ` Hugh Dickins [this message]
2019-01-02 4:16 ` Hugh Dickins
2019-01-02 17:47 ` Vineeth Pillai
2019-01-02 17:47 ` Vineeth Pillai
2019-01-02 19:43 ` Hugh Dickins
2019-01-02 19:43 ` Hugh Dickins
2019-01-02 20:05 ` Vineeth Pillai
2019-01-02 20:05 ` Vineeth Pillai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LSU.2.11.1901012010440.13241@eggly.anvils \
--to=hughd@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kelleynnn@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=vpillai@digitalocean.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox