From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
To: Kelley Nielsen <kelleynnn@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, riel@surriel.com, riel@redhat.com,
opw-kernel@googlegroups.com, hughd@google.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, jamieliu@google.com,
sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com, sarah.a.sharp@intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v4] mm: prototype: rid swapoff of quadratic complexity
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 12:32:03 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1403231218530.22062@eggly.anvils> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140321194141.GA14361@kelleynnn-virtual-machine>
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014, Kelley Nielsen wrote:
> The function try_to_unuse() is of quadratic complexity, with a lot of
> wasted effort. It unuses swap entries one by one, potentially iterating
> over all the page tables for all the processes in the system for each
> one.
>
> This new proposed implementation of try_to_unuse simplifies its
> complexity to linear. It iterates over the system's mms once, unusing
> all the affected entries as it walks each set of page tables. It also
> makes similar changes to shmem_unuse.
>
> Improvement
>
> Time took by swapoff on a swap partition containing about 240M of data,
> with about 1.1G free memory and about 520M swap available. Swap
> partition was on a laptop with a hard disk drive (not SSD).
>
> Present implementation....about 13.8s
> Prototype.................about 5.5s
I haven't studied the patch yet (and won't manage to do so in the week
ahead), nor examined its performance; but I have taken it out for a
spin, and I'm impressed by its robustness - swap being as racy as it
is, I had expected plenty of trouble, but very little - well done.
Just three little self-explanatory fixes needed so far, all down
at the out_put end: please fold in to your next version whenever.
Hugh
--- 3.14-rc7-kn/mm/swapfile.c 2014-03-22 12:22:46.420136358 -0700
+++ linux/mm/swapfile.c 2014-03-23 07:29:59.852002968 -0700
@@ -1479,12 +1479,14 @@ out_put:
* that we must not delete, since it may not have been written
* out to swap yet.
*/
+ lock_page(page);
if (PageSwapCache(page) &&
- likely(page_private(page) == entry.val)){
- lock_page(page);
+ likely(page_private(page) == entry.val)) {
+ wait_on_page_writeback(page);
delete_from_swap_cache(page);
- unlock_page(page);
}
+ unlock_page(page);
+ page_cache_release(page);
}
out:
return retval;
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-23 19:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20140321194141.GA14361@kelleynnn-virtual-machine>
2014-03-23 19:32 ` Hugh Dickins [this message]
2014-03-21 19:49 Kelley Nielsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LSU.2.11.1403231218530.22062@eggly.anvils \
--to=hughd@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jamieliu@google.com \
--cc=kelleynnn@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=opw-kernel@googlegroups.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=sarah.a.sharp@intel.com \
--cc=sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox