From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Alex Elder <elder@kernel.org>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>, Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm for fs: add truncate_pagecache_range
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 13:26:10 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1203251254570.1505@eggly.anvils> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120323155950.f9bfb097.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 14:14:54 -0700 (PDT)
> Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 23 Mar 2012, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >
> > > --- a/mm/truncate.c~mm-for-fs-add-truncate_pagecache_range-fix
> > > +++ a/mm/truncate.c
> > > @@ -639,6 +639,9 @@ int vmtruncate_range(struct inode *inode
> > > * with on-disk format, and the filesystem would not have to deal with
> > > * situations such as writepage being called for a page that has already
> > > * had its underlying blocks deallocated.
> > > + *
> > > + * Must be called with inode->i_mapping->i_mutex held.
> >
> > You catch me offguard: I forget whether that's an absolute requirement or
> > just commonly the case. What do the other interfaces in truncate.c say ?-)
>
> i_mutex is generally required, to stabilise i_size.
Sorry for being quarrelsome, but I do want to Nak your followup "fix".
Building a test kernel quickly told me that inode->i_mapping->i_mutex
doesn't exist, of course it's inode->i_mutex.
Then running the test kernel quickly told me that neither ext4 nor xfs
(I didn't try ocfs2) holds inode->i_mutex where holepunching calls
truncate_inode_pages_range().
Now, there might or might not be reasons why ext4 or xfs ought to hold
i_mutex there for its own consistency, but it's beyond me to determine
that: let's assume they're correct without evidence to the contrary.
Stabilizing i_size is not a reason: holepunching does not affect i_size
and is not affected by i_size (okay, ext4 still has the bug I reported
a couple of months ago, whereby its holepunching stops at i_size,
forgetting blocks fallocated beyond; but no doubt that will get fixed).
And nothing that truncate_pagecache_range() does needs i_mutex:
neither the unmap_mapping_range() nor the truncate_inode_pages_range()
needs i_mutex. A year ago, yes, Miklos showed how unmap_mapping_range()
was relying on mutex serialization, and added an additional mutex for
that, which Peter was able to remove once he mutified i_mmap_lock.
truncate_pagecache_range() is just a drop-in replacement for
truncate_inode_pages_range(), and has no different locking needs.
Hugh
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-25 20:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-23 20:46 Hugh Dickins
2012-03-23 21:01 ` Andrew Morton
2012-03-23 21:14 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-03-23 22:59 ` Andrew Morton
2012-03-25 20:26 ` Hugh Dickins [this message]
2012-03-25 20:50 ` Andrew Morton
2012-03-25 21:55 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-04-03 5:45 ` Joel Becker
2012-05-13 21:03 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-05-17 9:25 ` Joel Becker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LSU.2.00.1203251254570.1505@eggly.anvils \
--to=hughd@google.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bpm@sgi.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=elder@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mfasheh@suse.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox