linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
To: kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sysvshm: SHM_LOCK use lru_add_drain_all_async()
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 17:51:22 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1201031724300.1254@eggly.anvils> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1325403025-22688-2-git-send-email-kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>

On Sun, 1 Jan 2012, kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com wrote:
> From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> 
> shmctl also don't need synchrounous pagevec drain. This patch replace it with
> lru_add_drain_all_async().
> 
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>

Let me answer this 2/2 first since it's easier.

I'm going to thank you for bringing this lru_add_drain_all()
to my attention, I had not noticed it; but Nak the patch itself.

The reason being, that particular lru_add_drain_all() serves no
useful purpose, so let's delete it instead of replacing it.  I believe
that it serves no purpose for SHM_LOCK and no purpose for SHM_UNLOCK.

I'm dabbling in this area myself, since you so cogently pointed out that
I'd tried to add a cond_resched() to scan_mapping_unevictable_pages()
(which is a helper for SHM_UNLOCK here) while it's under spinlock.

In testing my fix for that, I find that there has been no attempt to
keep the Unevictable count accurate on SysVShm: SHM_LOCK pages get
marked unevictable lazily later as memory pressure discovers them -
which perhaps mirrors the way in which SHM_LOCK makes no attempt to
instantiate pages, unlike mlock.

Since nobody has complained about that in the two years since we've
had an Unevictable count in /proc/meminfo, I don't see any need to
add code (it would need more than just your change here; would need
more even than calling scan_mapping_unevictable_pages() at SHM_LOCK
time - though perhaps along with your 1/2 that could handle it) and
overhead to satisfy a need that nobody has.

I'll delete that lru_add_drain_all() in my patch, okay?

(But in writing this, realize I still don't quite understand why
the Unevictable count takes a second or two to get back to 0 after
SHM_UNLOCK: perhaps I've more to discover.)

Hugh

> ---
>  ipc/shm.c |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/ipc/shm.c b/ipc/shm.c
> index 02ecf2c..1eb25f0 100644
> --- a/ipc/shm.c
> +++ b/ipc/shm.c
> @@ -872,8 +872,6 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(shmctl, int, shmid, int, cmd, struct shmid_ds __user *, buf)
>  	{
>  		struct file *uninitialized_var(shm_file);
>  
> -		lru_add_drain_all();  /* drain pagevecs to lru lists */
> -
>  		shp = shm_lock_check(ns, shmid);
>  		if (IS_ERR(shp)) {
>  			err = PTR_ERR(shp);
> @@ -911,6 +909,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(shmctl, int, shmid, int, cmd, struct shmid_ds __user *, buf)
>  			shp->mlock_user = NULL;
>  		}
>  		shm_unlock(shp);
> +		/* prevent user visible mismatch of unevictable accounting */
> +		lru_add_drain_all_async();
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  	case IPC_RMID:
> -- 
> 1.7.1

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-04  1:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-30  6:36 [PATCH] mm: do not drain pagevecs for mlock Tao Ma
2011-12-30  8:11 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-12-30  8:48   ` Tao Ma
2011-12-30  9:31     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-12-30  9:45       ` Tao Ma
2011-12-30 10:07         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-01-01  7:30           ` [PATCH 1/2] mm,mlock: drain pagevecs asynchronously kosaki.motohiro
2012-01-04  1:17             ` Minchan Kim
2012-01-04  2:38               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-01-10  8:53                 ` Tao Ma
2012-01-04  2:56             ` Hugh Dickins
2012-01-04 22:05             ` Andrew Morton
2012-01-04 23:33               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-01-05  0:19                 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-01-01  7:30           ` [PATCH 2/2] sysvshm: SHM_LOCK use lru_add_drain_all_async() kosaki.motohiro
2012-01-04  1:51             ` Hugh Dickins [this message]
2012-01-04  2:19               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-01-04  5:17                 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-01-04  8:34                   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-01-06  6:13           ` [PATCH] mm: do not drain pagevecs for mlock Tao Ma
2012-01-06  6:18             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-01-06  6:30               ` Tao Ma
2012-01-06  6:33                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-01-06  6:46                   ` Tao Ma
2012-01-09 23:58                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-01-10  2:08                       ` Tao Ma
2012-01-09  7:25           ` Tao Ma
2011-12-30 10:14         ` KOSAKI Motohiro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LSU.2.00.1201031724300.1254@eggly.anvils \
    --to=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox