From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
To: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ksm: use FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY in breaking COW
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 20:16:06 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1111201923330.1806@sister.anvils> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJd=RBDP_z68Ewvw_O_dMxOnE0=weXqt+1FQy85_n76HAEdFHg@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011, Hillf Danton wrote:
> The flag, FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY, was introduced by the patch,
>
> mm: retry page fault when blocking on disk transfer
> commit: d065bd810b6deb67d4897a14bfe21f8eb526ba99
>
> for reducing mmap_sem hold times that are caused by waiting for disk
> transfers when accessing file mapped VMAs.
>
> To break COW, handle_mm_fault() is repeated with mmap_sem held, where
> the introduced flag could be used again.
>
> The straight way is to add changes in break_ksm(), but the function could be
> under write-mode mmap_sem, so it has to be dupilcated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
Thank you for making the patch; but unless I'm mistaken - please
correct me if so - I think it's better to keep break_cow() simple
than add special FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY handling there. Do you
have any evidence that its down_read of mmap_sem is a problem in
some workload? I sense that you're using it "because it's there".
I'm sceptical on several grounds.
One, break_cow() is itself only called on an "error" path: not
really an error, but when KSM's bet that it can merge pages turns
out to be wrong before it can complete the merge; not a rare case,
but not on the hot path.
Two, break_ksm()'s loop is required for correctness, but it
is a rare case that it actually needs to go round a second time.
The typical case it's needed (am I forgetting a more common one?)
is when userspace access flips a pte bit in between handle_pte_fault()
noting faulting pte, and the chosen fault handler checking pte_same()
before committing to its action. With the page marked PageKsm, yet
not in the stable tree, even page reclaim is unable to interfere.
Three, FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY is acted upon only in lock_page_or_retry(),
which is called only from filemap_fault() (not the case here since we
don't consider file pages for conversion to PageKsm) or do_swap_page();
yet the fault we're provoking would be handled by do_wp_page().
Four, lock_page_or_retry() is called in those places when there's a
possibility that the page is being read in from disk, to drop the
mmap_sem across the slow I/O. There is no precedent for dropping
mmap_sem here while allocating a new page, nor when pte_same() fails:
in the former case it could only be a win when the system is already
slowed by memory pressure, in the latter case there's little point,
since mmap_sem would be reacquired in a moment.
I think that amounts to a genial Nack!
Hugh
> ---
>
> --- a/mm/ksm.c Sat Nov 19 16:08:10 2011
> +++ b/mm/ksm.c Sat Nov 19 19:33:49 2011
> @@ -394,7 +394,31 @@ static void break_cow(struct rmap_item *
> goto out;
> if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_MERGEABLE) || !vma->anon_vma)
> goto out;
> - break_ksm(vma, addr);
> + for (;;) {
> + struct page *page;
> + int ret;
> +
> + page = follow_page(vma, addr, FOLL_GET);
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(page))
> + break;
> +
> + if (PageKsm(page))
> + ret = handle_mm_fault(mm, vma, addr,
> + FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY | FAULT_FLAG_WRITE);
> + else
> + ret = VM_FAULT_WRITE;
> +
> + put_page(page);
> +
> + if (!(ret & (VM_FAULT_WRITE|VM_FAULT_SIGBUS|VM_FAULT_OOM))) {
> + if (ret & VM_FAULT_RETRY)
> + down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> + } else {
> + if (ret & VM_FAULT_RETRY)
> + return;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> out:
> up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> }
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-21 4:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-19 11:50 Hillf Danton
2011-11-21 4:16 ` Hugh Dickins [this message]
2011-11-21 13:47 ` Hillf Danton
2011-11-21 22:23 ` Hugh Dickins
2011-11-22 13:04 ` Hillf Danton
2011-11-21 23:10 ` Michel Lespinasse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LSU.2.00.1111201923330.1806@sister.anvils \
--to=hughd@google.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhillf@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=walken@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox