From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
To: Bob Liu <lliubbo@gmail.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, hughd@google.com,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, hch@lst.de, npiggin@kernel.dk,
tj@kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com, lethal@linux-sh.org,
magnus.damm@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ramfs: fix memleak on no-mmu arch
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 19:52:37 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1104011929090.3340@sister.anvils> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1301290355-8980-1-git-send-email-lliubbo@gmail.com>
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Bob Liu wrote:
> On no-mmu arch, there is a memleak duirng shmem test.
> The cause of this memleak is ramfs_nommu_expand_for_mapping() added page
> refcount to 2 which makes iput() can't free that pages.
>
> The simple test file is like this:
> int main(void)
> {
> int i;
> key_t k = ftok("/etc", 42);
>
> for ( i=0; i<100; ++i) {
> int id = shmget(k, 10000, 0644|IPC_CREAT);
> if (id == -1) {
> printf("shmget error\n");
> }
> if(shmctl(id, IPC_RMID, NULL ) == -1) {
> printf("shm rm error\n");
> return -1;
> }
> }
> printf("run ok...\n");
> return 0;
> }
>
> And the result:
> root:/> free
> total used free shared buffers
> Mem: 60320 16644 43676 0 0
> -/+ buffers: 16644 43676
> root:/> shmem
> run ok...
> root:/> free
> total used free shared buffers
> Mem: 60320 17912 42408 0 0
> -/+ buffers: 17912 42408
> root:/> shmem
> run ok...
> root:/> free
> total used free shared buffers
> Mem: 60320 19096 41224 0 0
> -/+ buffers: 19096 41224
> root:/> shmem
> run ok...
> root:/> free
> total used free shared buffers
> Mem: 60320 20296 40024 0 0
> -/+ buffers: 20296 40024
> root:/> shmem
> run ok...
> root:/> free
> total used free shared buffers
> Mem: 60320 21496 38824 0 0
> -/+ buffers: 21496 38824
> root:/> shmem
> run ok...
> root:/> free
> total used free shared buffers
> Mem: 60320 22692 37628 0 0
> -/+ buffers: 22692 37628
> root:/>
>
> After this patch the test result is:(no memleak anymore)
> root:/>
> root:/> free
> total used free shared buffers
> Mem: 60320 16580 43740 0 0
> -/+ buffers: 16580 43740
> root:/> shmem
> run ok...
> root:/> free
> total used free shared buffers
> Mem: 60320 16668 43652 0 0
> -/+ buffers: 16668 43652
> root:/> shmem
> run ok...
> root:/> free
> total used free shared buffers
> Mem: 60320 16668 43652 0 0
> -/+ buffers: 16668 43652
> root:/> shmem
> run ok...
> root:/> free
> total used free shared buffers
> Mem: 60320 16668 43652 0 0
> -/+ buffers: 16668 43652
> root:/> shmem
> run ok...
> root:/> free
> total used free shared buffers
> Mem: 60320 16668 43652 0 0
> -/+ buffers: 16668 43652
> root:/> shmem
> run ok...
> root:/> free
> total used free shared buffers
> Mem: 60320 16668 43652 0 0
> -/+ buffers: 16668 43652
> root:/>
>
> Signed-off-by: Bob Liu <lliubbo@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Sorry for being so slow to get back to this, Bob.
And I'm sorry that in my original patch for it, I just couldn't
resist a little tidying up while I was there: which led Paul to
observe correctly that the function would be better off using
alloc_pages_exact(); which made me pause before responding,
seeing a proposal to rename that to get_free_pages_exact().
Aaaaaah, let's go with your patch below, which fixes the bug in
the simplest fashion; and do any tidying up at leisure later on.
I see Andrew is questioning the correctness of this patch:
let me answer his mail separately.
Hugh
> ---
> fs/ramfs/file-nommu.c | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ramfs/file-nommu.c b/fs/ramfs/file-nommu.c
> index 9eead2c..fbb0b47 100644
> --- a/fs/ramfs/file-nommu.c
> +++ b/fs/ramfs/file-nommu.c
> @@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ int ramfs_nommu_expand_for_mapping(struct inode *inode, size_t newsize)
> SetPageDirty(page);
>
> unlock_page(page);
> + put_page(page);
> }
>
> return 0;
> --
> 1.6.3.3
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-02 2:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-28 5:32 Bob Liu
2011-03-29 0:02 ` Andrew Morton
2011-03-29 11:06 ` Bob Liu
2011-04-01 8:25 ` Bob Liu
2011-04-02 3:39 ` Hugh Dickins
2011-04-02 3:35 ` Hugh Dickins
2011-04-01 15:19 ` David Howells
2011-04-02 2:52 ` Hugh Dickins [this message]
2011-04-13 16:45 David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LSU.2.00.1104011929090.3340@sister.anvils \
--to=hughd@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lliubbo@gmail.com \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox