From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail202.messagelabs.com (mail202.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.227]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AB8416B004D for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:30:01 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:29:41 +0000 (GMT) From: Hugh Dickins Subject: Re: [PATCH 01 of 31] define MADV_HUGEPAGE In-Reply-To: <20100127171316.GC12736@random.random> Message-ID: References: <20100127171316.GC12736@random.random> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Hugh Dickins , linux-mm@kvack.org, Marcelo Tosatti , Adam Litke , Avi Kivity , Izik Eidus , Nick Piggin , Rik van Riel , Mel Gorman , Andi Kleen , Dave Hansen , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Ingo Molnar , Mike Travis , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Christoph Lameter , Chris Wright , Andrew Morton , bpicco@redhat.com, Christoph Hellwig , KOSAKI Motohiro , Arnd Bergmann List-ID: On Wed, 27 Jan 2010, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > I've no problem to do the not-lazy way of madv-common.h, and yes I > think it's less confusing to have one number for all archs... > > Let's say, to me the important thing is we agree on one number, It is important to stabilize on a number, instead of having it shift from one version of the patchset to another; but I don't think it's important that the same number be used on every architecture. Hugh -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org