From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (mail-wi0-f174.google.com [209.85.212.174]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC07F6B0035 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 18:40:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wi0-f174.google.com with SMTP id d1so382007wiv.1 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 15:40:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx2.suse.de (cantor2.suse.de. [195.135.220.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c11si6596070wjs.107.2014.07.11.15.40.48 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 11 Jul 2014 15:40:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 00:40:40 +0200 (CEST) From: Jiri Kosina Subject: Re: [RFC Patch V1 00/30] Enable memoryless node on x86 platforms In-Reply-To: <20140711153314.GA6155@kroah.com> Message-ID: References: <1405064267-11678-1-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> <20140711082956.GC20603@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20140711153314.GA6155@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Greg KH Cc: Jiang Liu , Peter Zijlstra , Andrew Morton , Mel Gorman , David Rientjes , Mike Galbraith , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Tony Luck , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 11 Jul 2014, Greg KH wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 03:37:17PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote: > > > Any comments are welcomed! > > > > Why would anybody _ever_ have a memoryless node? That's ridiculous. > > I'm with Peter here, why would this be a situation that we should even > support? Are there machines out there shipping like this? I am pretty sure I've seen ppc64 machine with memoryless NUMA node. -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org