From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx117.postini.com [74.125.245.117]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 732026B0078 for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 23:22:10 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-qc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id t2so13050179qcq.14 for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 20:22:09 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 20:22:09 -0800 (PST) From: Hugh Dickins Subject: Re: [PATCH] tmpfs: support SEEK_DATA and SEEK_HOLE (reprise) In-Reply-To: <20121129024446.GY6434@dastard> Message-ID: References: <20121129024446.GY6434@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Dave Chinner Cc: Andrew Morton , Theodore Ts'o , Zheng Liu , Jeff liu , Jim Meyering , Paul Eggert , Christoph Hellwig , Josef Bacik , Andi Kleen , Andreas Dilger , Marco Stornelli , Chris Mason , Sunil Mushran , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org On Thu, 29 Nov 2012, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 05:22:03PM -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote: > > Revert 3.5's f21f8062201f ("tmpfs: revert SEEK_DATA and SEEK_HOLE") > > to reinstate 4fb5ef089b28 ("tmpfs: support SEEK_DATA and SEEK_HOLE"), > > with the intervening additional arg to generic_file_llseek_size(). > > > > In 3.8, ext4 is expected to join btrfs, ocfs2 and xfs with proper > > SEEK_DATA and SEEK_HOLE support; and a good case has now been made > > for it on tmpfs, so let's join the party. > > > > It's quite easy for tmpfs to scan the radix_tree to support llseek's new > > SEEK_DATA and SEEK_HOLE options: so add them while the minutiae are still > > on my mind (in particular, the !PageUptodate-ness of pages fallocated but > > still unwritten). > > > > [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix warning with CONFIG_TMPFS=n] > > Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins > > --- > > Does it pass the seek hole/data tests (285, 286) in xfstests? It did before and ... [install this, install that, install tother] ... yes, it still passes those tests - using Boris Ranto's patch extending xfstests to include tmpfs. Though I'd have even more confidence if they gave a little pat on the back for doing better than the no-op default, which also passes. Hugh -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org