From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@verizon.net>
Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>,
Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Bad page state (was Re: Linux 2.6.31-rc7)
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:17:48 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0908212055140.3158@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200908212248.40987.gene.heskett@verizon.net>
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> From messages, I already have a problem with lzma too:
And for this too, can you tell what the last working kernel was?
Does the problem happen consistently? (And btw, it's not probably so much
lzma, but something random that released a page without clearing some of
the page flags or something).
Wu - I'm not seeing a lot of changes to compund page handling except for
commit 20a0307c0396c2edb651401d2f2db193dda2f3c9 ("mm: introduce PageHuge()
for testing huge/gigantic pages").
That one removed the
set_compound_page_dtor(page, free_compound_page);
thing from prep_compound_gigantic_page(), which looks a bit odd and
suspicious (the commit message only talks about _moving_ it). But I don't
know the hugetlb code.
But that commit went into -rc1 already. Gene, I know you sent me email
about a later -rc release, but maybe you didn't test it on that machine or
with that config?
> Aug 21 22:37:47 coyote kernel: [ 1030.152737] BUG: Bad page state in process lzma pfn:a1093
> Aug 21 22:37:47 coyote kernel: [ 1030.152743] page:c28fc260 flags:80004000 count:0 mapcount:0 mapping:(null) index:0
> Aug 21 22:37:47 coyote kernel: [ 1030.152747] Pid: 17927, comm: lzma Not tainted 2.6.31-rc7 #1
> Aug 21 22:37:47 coyote kernel: [ 1030.152750] Call Trace:
> Aug 21 22:37:47 coyote kernel: [ 1030.152758] [<c130e363>] ? printk+0x23/0x40
> Aug 21 22:37:47 coyote kernel: [ 1030.152763] [<c108404f>] bad_page+0xcf/0x150
> Aug 21 22:37:47 coyote kernel: [ 1030.152767] [<c10850ed>] get_page_from_freelist+0x37d/0x480
> Aug 21 22:37:47 coyote kernel: [ 1030.152771] [<c10853cf>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0xdf/0x520
> Aug 21 22:37:47 coyote kernel: [ 1030.152775] [<c1096b19>] handle_mm_fault+0x4a9/0x9f0
> Aug 21 22:37:47 coyote kernel: [ 1030.152780] [<c1020d61>] do_page_fault+0x141/0x290
> Aug 21 22:37:47 coyote kernel: [ 1030.152784] [<c1020c20>] ? do_page_fault+0x0/0x290
> Aug 21 22:37:47 coyote kernel: [ 1030.152787] [<c1311bcb>] error_code+0x73/0x78
> Aug 21 22:37:47 coyote kernel: [ 1030.152789] Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint
It looks like 'flags' is the one that causes this problem at allocation
time (count, mapcount, mapping and index all look nicely zeroed).
In particular, it's the 0x4000 bit (the high bit, which is also set, is
the upper field bits for page section/node/zone numbers etc), which is
either PG_head or PG_compound depending on CONFIG_PAGEFLAGS_EXTENDED.
And in your case, since you have CONFIG_PAGEFLAGS_EXTENDED=y, it would be
PG_head.
Btw guys, why don't we check PG_head etc at free time when we add the page
to the free list? Now we get that annoying error only when it is way too
late, and have no way to know who screwed up..
Linus
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-22 4:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <alpine.LFD.2.01.0908211810390.3158@localhost.localdomain>
[not found] ` <200908212248.40987.gene.heskett@verizon.net>
2009-08-22 4:17 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2009-08-23 7:22 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-23 8:20 ` Gene Heskett
2009-08-23 16:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-23 17:04 ` Gene Heskett
2009-08-24 2:22 ` Gene Heskett
2009-08-24 13:55 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.01.0908212055140.3158@localhost.localdomain \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=gene.heskett@verizon.net \
--cc=hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox