From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail137.messagelabs.com (mail137.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.19]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 806986B004D for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 13:35:57 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:54:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] ZERO PAGE again v2 In-Reply-To: <20090709074745.GT2714@wotan.suse.de> Message-ID: References: <20090707165101.8c14b5ac.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090707084750.GX2714@wotan.suse.de> <20090707180629.cd3ac4b6.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090707140033.GB2714@wotan.suse.de> <20090708062125.GJ2714@wotan.suse.de> <20090709074745.GT2714@wotan.suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Nick Piggin Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk" , avi@redhat.com, "akpm@linux-foundation.org" List-ID: On Thu, 9 Jul 2009, Nick Piggin wrote: > > Having a ZERO_PAGE I'm not against, so I don't know why you claim > I am. Al I'm saying is that now we don't have one, we should have > some good reasons to introduce it again. Unreasonable? Umm. I had good reasons to introduce it in the _first_ place. And now you have reports of people who depend on the behaviour, and point to the new behaviour as a *regression*. What the _hell_ more do you want? Linus -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org