From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk" <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>,
avi@redhat.com,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] ZERO PAGE again v2
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 09:07:08 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0907080906410.3210@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090708062125.GJ2714@wotan.suse.de>
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
> I'm talking about the cases where you would want to use ZERO_PAGE for
> computing with anonymous memory (not for zeroing IO). In that case,
> the TLB would probably be the primary one.
Umm. Are you even listening to yourself?
OF COURSE the TLB would be the primary issue, since the zero page has made
cache effects go away.
BUT THAT IS A GOOD THING.
Instead of making it sound like "that's a bad thing, because now TLB
dominates", just say what's really going on: "that's a good thing, because
you made the cache access patterns wonderful".
See? You claim TLB is a problem, but it's really that you made all _other_
problems go away.
Now, it's true that you can avoid the TLB costs by moving the costs into a
"software TLB" (aka "indirection table"), and make the TLB footprint go
away by turning it into something else (indirection through a pointer).
Sometimes that speeds things up - because you may be able to actually
avoid doing other things by noticing huge gaps etc - but sometimes it
slows you down too - because indirection isn't free, and maybe there are
common cases where there isn't so many sparse accesses.
> I don't fight it. I had proposals to get rid of cache pingpong too,
> but you rejected that ;)
Yeah, and they were ugly as hell. I had a suggestion to just continue to
use PG_reserved (which was _way_ simpler than your version) before the
counting, but you and Hugh were on a religious agenda against the whole
PG_reserved bit.
So I don't understand why you claim that you fight it, when you CLEARLY
do. The patches that KAMEZAWA-san posted were already simpler than your
complicated models were - I just think they can be simpler still.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-08 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-07 7:51 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-07-07 7:52 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/4] introduce pte_zero() KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-07-07 7:54 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/4] use ZERO_PAGE for READ fault in regular anonymous mapping KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-07-07 7:59 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/4] get_user_pages READ fault handling special cases KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-07-07 16:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-08 0:03 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-07-08 1:38 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-07-08 2:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-07 8:01 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/4] add get user pages nozero KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-07-07 8:47 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/4] ZERO PAGE again v2 Nick Piggin
2009-07-07 9:05 ` Avi Kivity
2009-07-07 9:18 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-07-07 9:26 ` Avi Kivity
2009-07-07 9:06 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-07-07 14:00 ` Nick Piggin
2009-07-07 16:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-08 6:21 ` Nick Piggin
2009-07-08 16:07 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2009-07-09 7:47 ` Nick Piggin
2009-07-09 17:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-10 2:09 ` Nick Piggin
2009-07-10 3:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-10 3:51 ` Nick Piggin
2009-07-08 17:32 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-07-09 1:12 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-07-10 11:18 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-07-10 13:42 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-07-10 14:12 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-07-10 15:16 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-07-10 15:32 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-07-10 17:09 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-07-13 6:46 ` Nick Piggin
2009-07-13 7:24 ` Nick Piggin
2009-07-07 15:50 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.01.0907080906410.3210@localhost.localdomain \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox