Re: Security fix for remapping of page 0 (was [PATCH] Change ZERO_SIZE_PTR to point at unmapped space)

[Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>]

On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> That means that you've already by-passed all the main security. It's thus 
> by definition less common than attack vectors like buffer overflows that 
> give you that capability in the first place.

Btw, you obviously need to then _also_ pair it with some as-yet-unknown 
case of kernel bug to get to that NULL pointer (or zero-sized-alloc 
pointer) problem. 

You _also_ seem to be totally ignoring the fact that we already _do_ 
protect against NULL pointers by default.

So I really don't see why you're making a big deal of this. It's as if you 
were talking about us not randomizing the address space - sure, you can 
turn it off, but so what? We do it by default.

So it boils down to:

 - NULL pointers already cannot be in mmap memory (unless a distro has 
   done something wrong - outside of the kernel)

 - What's your beef? Let it go, man.

			Linus

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>