From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@novell.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [aarcange@redhat.com: [PATCH] fork vs gup(-fast) fix]
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:03:55 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0903171155090.3082@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090317184647.GC28447@random.random>
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
> I don't think you can tackle this from add_to_swap because the page
> may be in the swapcache well before gup runs (gup(write=1) can map the
> swapcache as exclusive and read-write in the pte).
If it's in the swap cache, it should be mapped read-only, and gup(write=1)
will do the COW break and un-swapcache it.
When can it be writably in the swap cache? The write-only thing is the one
we use to invalidate stale swap cache entries, and when we mark those
pages writable (in do_wp_page or do_swap_page) we always remove the page
from the swap cache at the same time.
Or is there some other path I missed?
> My preference is still to keeps pages with elevated refcount pinned in
> the ptes like 2.6.7 did, that will allow do_wp_page to takeover only
> pages with page_count not elevated without risk of calling do_wp_page
> on any page under gup.
I agree that that would also work - and be even simpler. If done right, we
can even avoid clearing the dirty bit (in page_mkclean()) for such pages,
and now it works for _all_ pages, not just anonymous pages.
IOW, even if you had a shared mapping and were to GUP() those pages for
writing, they'd _stay_ dirty until you free'd them - no need to re-dirty
them in case somebody did IO on them.
> Only worry I have now is how to compare count
> with mapcount when both can change under us if mapcount > 1, but if
> you meant page_mapcount in add_to_swap as I think, that logic in
> add_to_swap would have the same problem and so it needs a solution for
> doing a coherent/safe comparison too.
I don't think you can use just mapcount on its own - you have to compare
it to page_count(). Otherwise perfectly normal (non-gup) pages will
trigger, since that page count is the only thing that differs between the
two cases.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-17 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20090311170611.GA2079@elte.hu>
2009-03-11 17:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-11 17:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-11 17:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-11 18:37 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-11 18:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-11 19:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-11 19:59 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-11 20:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-11 20:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-11 20:55 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-11 21:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-11 21:57 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-11 22:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-11 22:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-11 22:22 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-03-11 22:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-14 5:07 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-03-11 20:48 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-14 5:06 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-03-14 5:20 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-16 16:01 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-03-16 16:23 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-16 16:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-16 16:50 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-16 17:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-16 17:19 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-16 17:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-16 18:02 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-16 18:05 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-16 18:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-16 18:33 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-16 19:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-17 5:44 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-16 18:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-16 18:29 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-16 19:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-17 5:42 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-17 5:58 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-16 18:37 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-16 18:28 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-16 23:59 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-18 2:04 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-03-22 12:23 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-03-23 0:13 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-03-23 16:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-23 16:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-24 5:08 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-03-24 13:43 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-24 17:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-30 10:52 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
[not found] ` <200904022307.12043.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
2009-04-03 3:49 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-17 0:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-17 0:56 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-17 12:19 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-17 16:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-17 17:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-17 17:10 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-17 17:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-17 18:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-17 18:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-17 18:46 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-17 19:03 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2009-03-17 19:35 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-17 19:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-11 19:06 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-12 5:36 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-12 16:23 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-12 17:00 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-12 17:20 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-12 17:23 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-12 18:06 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-12 18:58 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-13 16:09 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-13 19:34 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-14 4:59 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-16 13:56 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-16 16:01 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-14 4:46 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-14 5:06 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-11 18:53 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-11 18:22 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-11 19:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-11 19:15 ` Andrea Arcangeli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.0903171155090.3082@localhost.localdomain \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=npiggin@novell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox