linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@novell.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [aarcange@redhat.com: [PATCH] fork vs gup(-fast) fix]
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:03:55 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0903171155090.3082@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090317184647.GC28447@random.random>



On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> 
> I don't think you can tackle this from add_to_swap because the page
> may be in the swapcache well before gup runs (gup(write=1) can map the
> swapcache as exclusive and read-write in the pte).

If it's in the swap cache, it should be mapped read-only, and gup(write=1) 
will do the COW break and un-swapcache it.

When can it be writably in the swap cache? The write-only thing is the one 
we use to invalidate stale swap cache entries, and when we mark those 
pages writable (in do_wp_page or do_swap_page) we always remove the page 
from the swap cache at the same time.

Or is there some other path I missed?

> My preference is still to keeps pages with elevated refcount pinned in
> the ptes like 2.6.7 did, that will allow do_wp_page to takeover only
> pages with page_count not elevated without risk of calling do_wp_page
> on any page under gup.

I agree that that would also work - and be even simpler. If done right, we 
can even avoid clearing the dirty bit (in page_mkclean()) for such pages, 
and now it works for _all_ pages, not just anonymous pages.

IOW, even if you had a shared mapping and were to GUP() those pages for 
writing, they'd _stay_ dirty until you free'd them - no need to re-dirty 
them in case somebody did IO on them. 

> Only worry I have now is how to compare count
> with mapcount when both can change under us if mapcount > 1, but if
> you meant page_mapcount in add_to_swap as I think, that logic in
> add_to_swap would have the same problem and so it needs a solution for
> doing a coherent/safe comparison too.

I don't think you can use just mapcount on its own - you have to compare 
it to page_count(). Otherwise perfectly normal (non-gup) pages will 
trigger, since that page count is the only thing that differs between the 
two cases.

			Linus

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-17 19:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20090311170611.GA2079@elte.hu>
2009-03-11 17:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-11 17:41   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-11 17:58     ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-11 18:37       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-11 18:46         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-11 19:01           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-11 19:59             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-11 20:19               ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-11 20:33                 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-11 20:55                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-11 21:28                     ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-11 21:57                       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-11 22:06                         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-11 22:07                           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-11 22:22                           ` Davide Libenzi
2009-03-11 22:32                             ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-14  5:07                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-03-11 20:48                 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-14  5:06                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-03-14  5:20                   ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-16 16:01                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-03-16 16:23                       ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-16 16:32                         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-16 16:50                           ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-16 17:02                             ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-16 17:19                               ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-16 17:42                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-16 18:02                                   ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-16 18:05                                     ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-16 18:17                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-16 18:33                                         ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-16 19:22                                           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-17  5:44                                             ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-16 18:14                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-16 18:29                                       ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-16 19:17                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-17  5:42                                           ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-17  5:58                                             ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-16 18:37                                       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-16 18:28                                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-16 23:59                             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-18  2:04                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-03-22 12:23                           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-03-23  0:13                             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-03-23 16:29                               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-23 16:46                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-24  5:08                                   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-03-24 13:43                             ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-24 17:56                               ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-30 10:52                               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
     [not found]                                 ` <200904022307.12043.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
2009-04-03  3:49                                   ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-17  0:44                       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-17  0:56                         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-17 12:19                         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-17 16:43                           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-17 17:01                             ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-17 17:10                               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-17 17:43                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-17 18:09                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-17 18:19                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-17 18:46                                       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-17 19:03                                         ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2009-03-17 19:35                                           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-17 19:55                                             ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-11 19:06           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-12  5:36           ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-12 16:23             ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-12 17:00               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-12 17:20                 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-12 17:23                   ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-12 18:06                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-12 18:58                     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-13 16:09                     ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-13 19:34                       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-14  4:59                         ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-16 13:56                           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-16 16:01                             ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-14  4:46                       ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-14  5:06                         ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-11 18:53     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-11 18:22   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-03-11 19:06     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-11 19:15       ` Andrea Arcangeli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.0903171155090.3082@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=npiggin@novell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox