From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Jared Hulbert <jaredeh@gmail.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Carsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Maxim Shchetynin <maxim@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] xip: no struct pages -- get_xip_mem
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 23:37:32 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.00.0803072331090.2911@woody.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6934efce0803072033m5efd4d1o1ca8526f94649bb5@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 7 Mar 2008, Jared Hulbert wrote:
>
> [RFC][PATCH 1/3] xip: no struct pages -- get_xip_mem
>
> Convert XIP to support non-struct page backed memory.
> The get_xip_page API is changed from a page based to an address/pfn based one.
Is there any way we could just re-use the same calling conventions as we
already use for "vma->fault()"?
> + int (*get_xip_mem)(struct address_space *, pgoff_t, int, void **,
> + unsigned long *);
This really looks very close to
int (*fault)(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct vm_fault *vmf);
and "struct vm_fault" returns either a kernel virtual address or a "struct
page *"
So would it be possible to just use the same calling convention, except
passing a "struct address_space" instead of a "struct vm_area_struct"?
I realize that "struct vm_fault" doesn't have a pfn in it (if they don't
do a "struct page", they are expected to fill in the PTE directly instead
and return VM_FAULT_NOPAGE), but I wonder if it should.
The whole git_xip_page() issue really looks very similar to "fault in a
page from an address space". It feels kind of wrong to have filesystems
implement two functions for what seems to be the exact same issue.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-08 7:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-08 4:33 Jared Hulbert
2008-03-08 7:37 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2008-03-08 18:53 ` Jared Hulbert
2008-03-10 23:43 ` Jared Hulbert
2008-03-11 10:58 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.1.00.0803072331090.2911@woody.linux-foundation.org \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cotte@de.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=jaredeh@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=maxim@de.ibm.com \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox