From: Satyam Sharma <satyam@infradead.org>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] type safe allocator
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 13:07:47 +0530 (IST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0708021302500.8258@enigma.security.iitk.ac.in> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1IGAAI-0006K6-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
Hi Miklos,
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> I wonder why we don't have type safe object allocators a-la new() in
> C++ or g_new() in glib?
>
> fooptr = k_new(struct foo, GFP_KERNEL);
>
> is nicer and more descriptive than
>
> fooptr = kmalloc(sizeof(*fooptr), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> and more safe than
>
> fooptr = kmalloc(sizeof(struct foo), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> And we have zillions of both variants.
>
> Note, I'm not advocating mass replacement, but using this in new code,
> and gradually converting old ones whenever they need touching anyway.
> [...]
>
> +/**
> + * k_new - allocate given type object
> + * @type: the type of the object to allocate
> + * @flags: the type of memory to allocate.
> + */
> +#define k_new(type, flags) ((type *) kmalloc(sizeof(type), flags))
What others already said, plus:
kmalloc()'ing sizeof(struct foo) is not always what we want in C either.
Several kernel structs have zero-length / variable-length array members
and space must be allocated for them only at alloc() time ... would be
impossible to make them work with this scheme.
Satyam
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-02 7:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-01 9:06 Miklos Szeredi
2007-08-01 9:29 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-01 9:41 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-08-01 10:44 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-01 9:57 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-08-01 11:34 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-01 10:45 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-08-01 11:44 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-08-01 11:56 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-08-02 3:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-08-02 7:27 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-08-02 12:05 ` Al Viro
2007-08-02 13:05 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-08-02 17:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-08-02 5:33 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-02 7:38 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-08-02 19:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-02 7:37 ` Satyam Sharma [this message]
2007-08-02 7:40 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-08-02 11:31 ` [PATCH] " Miklos Szeredi, Miklos Szeredi
2007-08-02 12:04 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2007-08-02 12:24 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-08-02 13:06 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-08-02 13:35 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-08-02 13:49 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-08-02 13:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-08-02 14:06 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2007-08-02 14:08 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-08-02 18:36 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-02 18:48 ` Miklos Szeredi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.0.999.0708021302500.8258@enigma.security.iitk.ac.in \
--to=satyam@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox