From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: "Zhang, Qiang" <Qiang.Zhang@windriver.com>
Cc: "cl@linux.com" <cl@linux.com>,
"penberg@kernel.org" <penberg@kernel.org>,
"iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com" <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 回复: [PATCH] mm/slab.c: add node spinlock protect in __cache_free_alien
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 16:32:46 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.23.453.2007291631040.3120473@chino.kir.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR11MB2632BEC45DC867E80F841B82FF700@BYAPR11MB2632.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On Wed, 29 Jul 2020, Zhang, Qiang wrote:
> > From: Zhang Qiang <qiang.zhang@windriver.com>
> >
> > We should add node spinlock protect "n->alien" which may be
> > assigned to NULL in cpuup_canceled func. cause address access
> > exception.
> >
>
> >Hi, do you have an example NULL pointer dereference where you have hit
> >this?
>
If you have a NULL pointer dereference or a GPF that occurred because of
this, it would be helpful to provide as rationale.
> >This rather looks like something to fix up in cpuup_canceled() since it's
> >currently manipulating the alien cache for the canceled cpu's node.
>
> yes , it is fix up in cpuup_canceled it's
> currently manipulating the alien cache for the canceled cpu's node which may be the same as the node being operated on in the __cache_free_alien func.
>
> void cpuup_canceled
> {
> n = get_node(cachep, node);
> spin_lock_irq(&n->list_lock);
> ...
> n->alien = NULL;
> spin_unlock_irq(&n->list_lock);
> ....
> }
>
Right, so the idea is that this should be fixed in cpuup_canceled()
instead -- why would we invaliate the entire node's alien cache because a
single cpu failed to come online?
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-29 23:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-28 9:55 qiang.zhang
2020-07-28 19:46 ` David Rientjes
2020-07-29 1:25 ` 回复: " Zhang, Qiang
2020-07-29 23:32 ` David Rientjes [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.23.453.2007291631040.3120473@chino.kir.corp.google.com \
--to=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=Qiang.Zhang@windriver.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox