From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0987BC433F5 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 08:15:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADE8D61027 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 08:15:50 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org ADE8D61027 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gentwo.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 4EE036B006C; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 04:15:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 49DCB6B0072; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 04:15:50 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 3B4EB6B0073; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 04:15:50 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0089.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.89]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D54E6B006C for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 04:15:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin07.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E23108249980 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 08:15:49 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78734251218.07.9AE6A44 Received: from gentwo.de (vmi485042.contaboserver.net [161.97.139.209]) by imf29.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 700129000163 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 08:15:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gentwo.de (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 678CBB00100; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 10:15:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gentwo.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66D47B0006A; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 10:15:48 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 10:15:48 +0200 (CEST) From: Christoph Lameter To: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com> cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pekka Enberg , David Rientjes , Joonsoo Kim , Andrew Morton , Vlastimil Babka Subject: Re: Do we really need SLOB nowdays? In-Reply-To: <20211017135708.GA8442@kvm.asia-northeast3-a.c.our-ratio-313919.internal> Message-ID: References: <20211017042852.GA3050@kvm.asia-northeast3-a.c.our-ratio-313919.internal> <20211017133618.GA7989@kvm.asia-northeast3-a.c.our-ratio-313919.internal> <20211017135708.GA8442@kvm.asia-northeast3-a.c.our-ratio-313919.internal> User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (DEB 394 2020-01-19) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Stat-Signature: bq6x8t8jufe4hbnjzgmkctiyinc9auwy X-Rspamd-Server: rspam01 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 700129000163 Authentication-Results: imf29.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (imf29.hostedemail.com: domain of cl@gentwo.de designates 161.97.139.209 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=cl@gentwo.de X-HE-Tag: 1635149749-606209 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Sun, 17 Oct 2021, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote: > And one more question: > in Christoph's presentation [1], it says SLOB uses > 300 KB of memory. but on my system it uses almost 8000 KB. > what's is differences? Hmmm.... Someone already made "improvements" to SLOB? Kernel needs to be compiled for minimal overhead and debugging removed.