From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C12F1C433F5 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 08:14:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6657B60EE9 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 08:14:10 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 6657B60EE9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gentwo.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id DF1066B006C; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 04:14:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id DA1DC6B0072; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 04:14:09 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id C8F33940007; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 04:14:09 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0119.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.119]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B60766B006C for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 04:14:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin15.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A582181318AD for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 08:14:09 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78734247018.15.6A760BA Received: from gentwo.de (vmi485042.contaboserver.net [161.97.139.209]) by imf07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75E191000099 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 08:14:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gentwo.de (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 00010B00100; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 10:14:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gentwo.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFD55B0006A; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 10:14:06 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 10:14:06 +0200 (CEST) From: Christoph Lameter To: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com> cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pekka Enberg , David Rientjes , Joonsoo Kim , Andrew Morton , Vlastimil Babka Subject: Re: [RFC] More deterministic SLOB for real time embedded systems In-Reply-To: <20211017042852.GA3050@kvm.asia-northeast3-a.c.our-ratio-313919.internal> Message-ID: References: <20211017042852.GA3050@kvm.asia-northeast3-a.c.our-ratio-313919.internal> User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (DEB 394 2020-01-19) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Stat-Signature: 73f9zpiotb9chxddr6d77z8coad3jidy X-Rspamd-Server: rspam01 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 75E191000099 Authentication-Results: imf07.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (imf07.hostedemail.com: domain of cl@gentwo.de designates 161.97.139.209 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=cl@gentwo.de X-HE-Tag: 1635149648-753972 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Sun, 17 Oct 2021, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote: > But memory usage of SLUB is too high for systems with low memory. The memory usage of SLUB without all the extras (partial slabs, debugging etc etc) is very comparable to SLOB.