From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98520C433EF for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 07:20:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BF2260C4A for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 07:20:40 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 5BF2260C4A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gentwo.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 015DB6B0071; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 03:20:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id EE1526B0072; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 03:20:39 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id DA9B7900002; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 03:20:39 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0091.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.91]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CABC06B0071 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 03:20:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin25.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F37F92FD99 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 07:20:37 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78683308914.25.49F2B47 Received: from gentwo.de (vmi485042.contaboserver.net [161.97.139.209]) by imf15.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91095D001F3A for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 07:20:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gentwo.de (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 44B44B00691; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:20:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gentwo.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42397B0025F; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:20:36 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:20:36 +0200 (CEST) From: Christoph Lameter To: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com> cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pekka Enberg , David Rientjes , Joonsoo Kim , Andrew Morton , Vlastimil Babka Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, slub: Use prefetchw instead of prefetch In-Reply-To: <20211008133602.4963-1-42.hyeyoo@gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <20211008133602.4963-1-42.hyeyoo@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (DEB 394 2020-01-19) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Rspamd-Server: rspam01 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 91095D001F3A X-Stat-Signature: 8poefz3kbitekwgwh96sp3kbhynhrpee Authentication-Results: imf15.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (imf15.hostedemail.com: domain of cl@gentwo.de designates 161.97.139.209 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=cl@gentwo.de X-HE-Tag: 1633936837-464655 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, 8 Oct 2021, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote: > It's certain that an object will be not only read, but also > written after allocation. get_freepointer is used in multiple code path not only in allocation. It is for example used when scanning through a freelist. With this change all objects get needlessly dirtied and the cross cpu cache contention is increased.