From: Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.de>
To: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Wen Yang <wenyang@linux.alibaba.com>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@gmail.com>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] mm/slub: Use percpu partial free counter
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 10:14:53 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2103021012010.860725@gentwo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1597061872-58724-4-git-send-email-xlpang@linux.alibaba.com>
On Mon, 10 Aug 2020, Xunlei Pang wrote:
>
> diff --git a/mm/slab.h b/mm/slab.h
> index c85e2fa..a709a70 100644
> --- a/mm/slab.h
> +++ b/mm/slab.h
> @@ -616,7 +616,7 @@ struct kmem_cache_node {
> #ifdef CONFIG_SLUB
> unsigned long nr_partial;
> struct list_head partial;
> - atomic_long_t partial_free_objs;
> + atomic_long_t __percpu *partial_free_objs;
A percpu counter is never atomic. Just use unsigned long and use this_cpu
operations for this thing. That should cut down further on the overhead.
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -1775,11 +1775,21 @@ static void discard_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page)
> /*
> * Management of partially allocated slabs.
> */
> +static inline long get_partial_free(struct kmem_cache_node *n)
> +{
> + long nr = 0;
> + int cpu;
> +
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> + nr += atomic_long_read(per_cpu_ptr(n->partial_free_objs, cpu));
this_cpu_read(*n->partial_free_objs)
> static inline void
> __update_partial_free(struct kmem_cache_node *n, long delta)
> {
> - atomic_long_add(delta, &n->partial_free_objs);
> + atomic_long_add(delta, this_cpu_ptr(n->partial_free_objs));
this_cpu_add()
and so on.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-02 9:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-10 12:17 [PATCH v2 0/3] mm/slub: Fix count_partial() problem Xunlei Pang
2020-08-10 12:17 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mm/slub: Introduce two counters for partial objects Xunlei Pang
2020-08-10 12:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] mm/slub: Get rid of count_partial() Xunlei Pang
2020-08-10 12:17 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] mm/slub: Use percpu partial free counter Xunlei Pang
2021-03-02 5:56 ` Shu Ming
2021-03-02 9:14 ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2021-03-03 13:46 ` Xunlei Pang
2021-03-03 14:26 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-03-03 19:15 ` Christoph Lameter
2021-03-03 19:30 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-03-03 19:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2021-03-03 20:16 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-08-20 14:02 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] mm/slub: Fix count_partial() problem Pekka Enberg
2020-08-24 10:04 ` xunlei
2021-03-01 10:31 ` Shu Ming
2021-03-03 13:34 ` Xunlei Pang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2103021012010.860725@gentwo.de \
--to=cl@gentwo.de \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@gmail.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=wenyang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=xlpang@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox