linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Knut Omang <knut.omang@oracle.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	 Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: provide interface for retrieving kmem_cache name
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 12:50:55 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1911071249500.88963@chino.kir.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191107131342.GT8314@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On Thu, 7 Nov 2019, Michal Hocko wrote:

> On Thu 07-11-19 13:26:09, Knut Omang wrote:
> > On Thu, 2019-11-07 at 12:58 +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Thu 07-11-19 12:54:04, Knut Omang wrote:
> > > > With the restructuring done in commit 9adeaa226988
> > > > ("mm, slab: move memcg_cache_params structure to mm/slab.h")
> > > > 
> > > > it is no longer possible for code external to mm to access
> > > > the name of a kmem_cache as struct kmem_cache has effectively become
> > > > opaque. Having access to the cache name is helpful to kernel testing
> > > > infrastructure.
> > > > 
> > > > Expose a new function kmem_cache_name to mitigate that.
> > > 
> > > Who is going to use that symbol? It is preferred that a user is added in
> > > the same patch as the newly added symbol.
> > 
> > Yes, I am aware that that's the normal practice, 
> > we're currently using cache->name directly in the kernel 
> > unit test framework KTF (https://github.com/oracle/ktf/)
> > which we are working (https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/8/13/111) to get 
> > into the kernel in one form or another.
> 
> Please add the export with a patch that really needs it.
> 

Agree, this patch could be added as a predecessor to the series at
https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/8/13/111 which would use it.  If it's obvious 
why using the kmem cache name is useful in that series, acking this will 
be a no brainer.


  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-07 20:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-07 11:54 Knut Omang
2019-11-07 11:58 ` Michal Hocko
2019-11-07 12:26   ` Knut Omang
2019-11-07 13:13     ` Michal Hocko
2019-11-07 20:50       ` David Rientjes [this message]
2019-11-08 15:37       ` Christopher Lameter
2019-11-08 16:44         ` Knut Omang
2019-11-08 16:49           ` Christopher Lameter
2019-11-08 20:40             ` Knut Omang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.21.1911071249500.88963@chino.kir.corp.google.com \
    --to=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=knut.omang@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox