From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg1-f199.google.com (mail-pg1-f199.google.com [209.85.215.199]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88BFD6B5911 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 17:32:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pg1-f199.google.com with SMTP id f13-v6so7486240pgs.15 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 14:32:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-sor-f65.google.com (mail-sor-f65.google.com. [209.85.220.65]) by mx.google.com with SMTPS id u64-v6sor3041877pgu.382.2018.08.31.14.32.56 for (Google Transport Security); Fri, 31 Aug 2018 14:32:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 14:32:54 -0700 (PDT) From: David Rientjes Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mm/slub.c: Switch to bitmap_zalloc() In-Reply-To: <20180830104301.61649-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Message-ID: References: <20180830104301.61649-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Christoph Lameter , Pekka Enberg , Joonsoo Kim , linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton On Thu, 30 Aug 2018, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Switch to bitmap_zalloc() to show clearly what we are allocating. > Besides that it returns pointer of bitmap type instead of opaque void *. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko Tested-by: David Rientjes