From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f72.google.com (mail-wm0-f72.google.com [74.125.82.72]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8D346B0003 for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2018 16:17:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wm0-f72.google.com with SMTP id r13-v6so3379375wmc.8 for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2018 13:17:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de. [2a01:7a0:2:106d:700::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m9-v6si9261508wru.90.2018.08.11.13.17.08 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 11 Aug 2018 13:17:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2018 22:16:56 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [4.18.0 rc8 BUG] possible irq lock inversion dependency detected In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20180811113039.GA10397@bombadil.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Mikhail Gavrilov Cc: willy@infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, bp@suse.de, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, thomas.lendacky@amd.com On Sun, 12 Aug 2018, Mikhail Gavrilov wrote: > > Perfect, the issue was gone! > Can I hope to see this patch in 4.18 kernel or already too late? I fear it's late unless Paolo will pick it up, but it will be tagged for stable anyway. I'll try to carve out a few minutes tomorrow to send a proper patch with changelog, but now beer at the camp fire is more important. Thanks, tglx