From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f69.google.com (mail-it0-f69.google.com [209.85.214.69]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 135FC6B0012 for ; Mon, 2 Apr 2018 13:20:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-it0-f69.google.com with SMTP id a10-v6so5245837itb.1 for ; Mon, 02 Apr 2018 10:20:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from resqmta-ch2-08v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-08v.sys.comcast.net. [2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:40]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 2si545494ios.86.2018.04.02.10.20.52 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 02 Apr 2018 10:20:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2018 12:20:51 -0500 (CDT) From: Christopher Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] kfree_rcu() should use kfree_bulk() interface In-Reply-To: <1522647064-27167-3-git-send-email-rao.shoaib@oracle.com> Message-ID: References: <1522647064-27167-1-git-send-email-rao.shoaib@oracle.com> <1522647064-27167-3-git-send-email-rao.shoaib@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Rao Shoaib Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, joe@perches.com, willy@infradead.org, brouer@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org On Sun, 1 Apr 2018, rao.shoaib@oracle.com wrote: > kfree_rcu() should use the new kfree_bulk() interface for freeing > rcu structures as it is more efficient. It would be even better if this approach could also use kmem_cache_free_bulk() or kfree_bulk()