From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pl0-f69.google.com (mail-pl0-f69.google.com [209.85.160.69]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74FED6B000A for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 18:58:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pl0-f69.google.com with SMTP id x8-v6so13938837pln.9 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 15:58:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-sor-f41.google.com (mail-sor-f41.google.com. [209.85.220.41]) by mx.google.com with SMTPS id f9sor4198287pgq.422.2018.03.26.15.58.30 for (Google Transport Security); Mon, 26 Mar 2018 15:58:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 15:58:28 -0700 (PDT) From: David Rientjes Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/sparse: pass the __highest_present_section_nr + 1 to alloc_func() In-Reply-To: <20180326225621.GA79778@WeideMacBook-Pro.local> Message-ID: References: <20180326081956.75275-1-richard.weiyang@gmail.com> <20180326223034.GA78976@WeideMacBook-Pro.local> <20180326225621.GA79778@WeideMacBook-Pro.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Wei Yang Cc: dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@suse.com, linux-mm@kvack.org On Tue, 27 Mar 2018, Wei Yang wrote: > >Lol. I think it would make more sense for the second patch to come before > >the first > > Thanks for your comment. > > Do I need to reorder the patch and send v2? > I think we can just ask Andrew to apply backwards, but it's not crucial. The ordering of patch 2 before patch 1 simply helped me to understand the boundaries better.