linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>,
	cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: Add kvmalloc_ab_c and kvzalloc_struct
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 20:27:46 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1802142026520.2178@hadrien> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5jL9hqQGe672CmvFwqNbtTr=qu7WRwHuS4Vy7o5sX_UTgg@mail.gmail.com>



On Wed, 14 Feb 2018, Kees Cook wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:26 AM, Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> wrote:
> > From: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
> >
> > We have kvmalloc_array in order to safely allocate an array with a
> > number of elements specified by userspace (avoiding arithmetic overflow
> > leading to a buffer overrun).  But it's fairly common to have a header
> > in front of that array (eg specifying the length of the array), so we
> > need a helper function for that situation.
> >
> > kvmalloc_ab_c() is the workhorse that does the calculation, but in spite
> > of our best efforts to name the arguments, it's really hard to remember
> > which order to put the arguments in.  kvzalloc_struct() eliminates that
> > effort; you tell it about the struct you're allocating, and it puts the
> > arguments in the right order for you (and checks that the arguments
> > you've given are at least plausible).
> >
> > For comparison between the three schemes:
> >
> >         sev = kvzalloc(sizeof(*sev) + sizeof(struct v4l2_kevent) * elems,
> >                         GFP_KERNEL);
> >         sev = kvzalloc_ab_c(elems, sizeof(struct v4l2_kevent), sizeof(*sev),
> >                         GFP_KERNEL);
> >         sev = kvzalloc_struct(sev, events, elems, GFP_KERNEL);
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/mm.h | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 51 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> > index 81bd7f0be286..ddf929c5aaee 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> > @@ -557,6 +557,57 @@ static inline void *kvmalloc_array(size_t n, size_t size, gfp_t flags)
> >         return kvmalloc(n * size, flags);
> >  }
> >
> > +/**
> > + * kvmalloc_ab_c() - Allocate memory.
>
> Longer description, maybe? "Allocate a *b + c bytes of memory"?
>
> > + * @n: Number of elements.
> > + * @size: Size of each element (should be constant).
> > + * @c: Size of header (should be constant).
>
> If these should be constant, should we mark them as "const"? Or WARN
> if __builtin_constant_p() isn't true?
>
> > + * @gfp: Memory allocation flags.
> > + *
> > + * Use this function to allocate @n * @size + @c bytes of memory.  This
> > + * function is safe to use when @n is controlled from userspace; it will
> > + * return %NULL if the required amount of memory cannot be allocated.
> > + * Use kvfree() to free the allocated memory.
> > + *
> > + * The kvzalloc_hdr_arr() function is easier to use as it has typechecking
>
> renaming typo? Should this be "kvzalloc_struct()"?
>
> > + * and you do not need to remember which of the arguments should be constants.
> > + *
> > + * Context: Process context.  May sleep; the @gfp flags should be based on
> > + *         %GFP_KERNEL.
> > + * Return: A pointer to the allocated memory or %NULL.
> > + */
> > +static inline __must_check
> > +void *kvmalloc_ab_c(size_t n, size_t size, size_t c, gfp_t gfp)
> > +{
> > +       if (size != 0 && n > (SIZE_MAX - c) / size)
> > +               return NULL;
> > +
> > +       return kvmalloc(n * size + c, gfp);
> > +}
> > +#define kvzalloc_ab_c(a, b, c, gfp)    kvmalloc_ab_c(a, b, c, gfp | __GFP_ZERO)
>
> Nit: "(gfp) | __GFP_ZERO" just in case of insane usage.
>
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * kvzalloc_struct() - Allocate and zero-fill a structure containing a
> > + *                    variable length array.
> > + * @p: Pointer to the structure.
> > + * @member: Name of the array member.
> > + * @n: Number of elements in the array.
> > + * @gfp: Memory allocation flags.
> > + *
> > + * Allocate (and zero-fill) enough memory for a structure with an array
> > + * of @n elements.  This function is safe to use when @n is specified by
> > + * userspace as the arithmetic will not overflow.
> > + * Use kvfree() to free the allocated memory.
> > + *
> > + * Context: Process context.  May sleep; the @gfp flags should be based on
> > + *         %GFP_KERNEL.
> > + * Return: Zero-filled memory or a NULL pointer.
> > + */
> > +#define kvzalloc_struct(p, member, n, gfp)                             \
> > +       (typeof(p))kvzalloc_ab_c(n,                                     \
> > +               sizeof(*(p)->member) + __must_be_array((p)->member),    \
> > +               offsetof(typeof(*(p)), member), gfp)
> > +
> >  extern void kvfree(const void *addr);
> >
> >  static inline atomic_t *compound_mapcount_ptr(struct page *page)
>
> It might be nice to include another patch that replaces some of the
> existing/common uses of a*b+c with the new function...
>
> Otherwise, yes, please. We could build a coccinelle rule for
> additional replacements...

Thanks for the suggestion.  I will look into it.

julia

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-14 19:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-14 18:26 [PATCH 0/2] Add kvzalloc_struct to complement kvzalloc_array Matthew Wilcox
2018-02-14 18:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: Add kernel-doc for kvfree Matthew Wilcox
2018-02-14 18:26 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: Add kvmalloc_ab_c and kvzalloc_struct Matthew Wilcox
2018-02-14 19:22   ` Kees Cook
2018-02-14 19:27     ` Julia Lawall [this message]
2018-02-14 19:35     ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-03-07 21:18     ` Julia Lawall
2018-03-08  2:58       ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-03-08  6:24         ` Julia Lawall
2018-03-08 23:05           ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-03-09  5:59             ` Julia Lawall
2018-03-13 17:19             ` Julia Lawall
2018-03-13 18:32               ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-03-13 18:35                 ` Julia Lawall
2018-04-29 16:59                 ` Kees Cook
2018-04-29 20:30                   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-04-30 19:02                     ` Kees Cook
2018-04-30 20:16                       ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-04-30 21:29                         ` Rasmus Villemoes
2018-04-30 22:41                           ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-05-01 17:00                           ` Kees Cook
2018-05-01 17:41                             ` Julia Lawall
2018-05-03 23:00                             ` Rasmus Villemoes
2018-05-04  0:36                               ` Kees Cook
2018-05-04  0:40                                 ` Kees Cook
2018-04-30 22:29                         ` Kees Cook
2018-02-14 19:55   ` Christopher Lameter
2018-02-14 20:14     ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-02-15 15:55       ` Christopher Lameter
2018-02-15 16:23         ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-02-15 17:06           ` Christopher Lameter
2018-02-22  1:28             ` Kees Cook
2018-05-04  7:42   ` Linus Torvalds
2018-05-04 13:14     ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-05-04 15:35       ` Linus Torvalds
2018-05-04 16:03         ` Kees Cook
2018-02-14 18:47 ` [PATCH 0/2] Add kvzalloc_struct to complement kvzalloc_array Joe Perches
2018-02-14 19:23   ` Kees Cook
2018-02-14 19:32     ` Joe Perches
2018-02-14 19:36       ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-02-14 19:43         ` Joe Perches
2018-02-14 19:56           ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-02-14 20:06             ` Joe Perches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1802142026520.2178@hadrien \
    --to=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mawilcox@microsoft.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox