From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f71.google.com (mail-it0-f71.google.com [209.85.214.71]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3162B6B0038 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 13:47:52 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-it0-f71.google.com with SMTP id p144so632555itc.9 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 10:47:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from resqmta-ch2-01v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-01v.sys.comcast.net. [69.252.207.33]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g11si23199365iob.253.2017.11.28.10.47.51 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 28 Nov 2017 10:47:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 12:46:50 -0600 (CST) From: Christopher Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/23] slab: make kmalloc_index() return "unsigned int" In-Reply-To: <20171127163658.44c3121e47ea3b2cf230c36b@linux-foundation.org> Message-ID: References: <20171123221628.8313-1-adobriyan@gmail.com> <20171127163658.44c3121e47ea3b2cf230c36b@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Andrew Morton Cc: Alexey Dobriyan , linux-mm@kvack.org, penberg@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com On Mon, 27 Nov 2017, Andrew Morton wrote: > > add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/2 up/down: 0/-6 (-6) > > Function old new delta > > rtsx_scsi_handler 9116 9114 -2 > > vnic_rq_alloc 424 420 -4 > > While I applaud the use of accurate and appropriate types, that's one > heck of a big patch series. What do the slab maintainers think? Run some regression tests and make sure that we did not get some false aliasing? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org