From: Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@huawei.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@suse.com, mingo@kernel.org,
rientjes@google.com, n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com,
salls@cs.ucsb.edu, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tanxiaojun@huawei.com,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 4/4] mm/mempolicy: add nodes_empty check in SYSC_migrate_pages
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 09:29:49 -0600 (CST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1711060926001.9015@nuc-kabylake> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d774ecf6-5e7b-e185-85a0-27bf2bcacfb4@suse.cz>
On Mon, 6 Nov 2017, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> I'm not sure what exactly is the EPERM intention. Should really the
> capability of THIS process override the cpuset restriction of the TARGET
> process? Maybe yes. Then, does "insufficient privilege (CAP_SYS_NICE) to
CAP_SYS_NICE never overrides cpuset restrictions. The cap can be used to
migrate pages that are *also* mapped by other processes (and thus move
pages of another process which may have different cpu set restrictions!).
The cap should not allow migrating pages to nodes that are not allowed by
the cpuset of the current process.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-06 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-27 10:14 [PATCH RFC v2 0/4] some fixes and clean up for mempolicy Yisheng Xie
2017-10-27 10:14 ` [PATCH RFC v2 1/4] mm/mempolicy: Fix get_nodes() mask miscalculation Yisheng Xie
2017-10-31 8:34 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-11-01 9:37 ` Yisheng Xie
2017-10-27 10:14 ` [PATCH RFC v2 2/4] mm/mempolicy: remove redundant check in get_nodes Yisheng Xie
2017-10-31 8:55 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-10-27 10:14 ` [PATCH RFC v2 3/4] mm/mempolicy: fix the check of nodemask from user Yisheng Xie
2017-10-31 9:30 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-10-31 11:01 ` Yisheng Xie
2017-10-31 11:28 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-10-27 10:14 ` [PATCH RFC v2 4/4] mm/mempolicy: add nodes_empty check in SYSC_migrate_pages Yisheng Xie
2017-10-31 9:46 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-11-06 1:31 ` Yisheng Xie
2017-11-06 7:39 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-11-06 15:29 ` Christopher Lameter [this message]
2017-11-07 11:23 ` Yisheng Xie
2017-11-07 14:54 ` Christopher Lameter
2017-11-07 15:05 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-11-07 15:55 ` Christopher Lameter
2017-11-08 1:38 ` Yisheng Xie
2017-11-08 15:02 ` Christopher Lameter
2017-11-09 10:54 ` Yisheng Xie
2017-11-09 15:46 ` Christopher Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1711060926001.9015@nuc-kabylake \
--to=cl@linux.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=salls@cs.ucsb.edu \
--cc=tanxiaojun@huawei.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=xieyisheng1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox