From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f70.google.com (mail-it0-f70.google.com [209.85.214.70]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 008006B0292 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 10:34:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-it0-f70.google.com with SMTP id d68so69538280ita.13 for ; Fri, 02 Jun 2017 07:34:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from resqmta-ch2-05v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-05v.sys.comcast.net. [2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:37]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p14si854972ioi.54.2017.06.02.07.34.00 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 02 Jun 2017 07:34:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 09:33:59 -0500 (CDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: 4.12-rc ppc64 4k-page needs costly allocations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <87h9014j7t.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> <878tlb2igt.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Hugh Dickins Cc: Michael Ellerman , "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-mm@kvack.org On Thu, 1 Jun 2017, Hugh Dickins wrote: > SLUB versus SLAB, cpu versus memory? Since someone has taken the > trouble to write it with ctors in the past, I didn't feel on firm > enough ground to recommend such a change. But it may be obvious > to someone else that your suggestion would be better (or worse). Umm how about using alloc_pages() for pageframes? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org