Re: [RFC 09/10] x86/mm: Rework lazy TLB to track the actual loaded mm

[Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>]

On Wed, 10 May 2017, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, 7 May 2017, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > >  /* context.lock is held for us, so we don't need any locking. */
> > >  static void flush_ldt(void *current_mm)
> > >  {
> > > +	struct mm_struct *mm = current_mm;
> > >  	mm_context_t *pc;
> > >  
> > > -	if (current->active_mm != current_mm)
> > > +	if (this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm) != current_mm)
> > 
> > While functional correct, this really should compare against 'mm'.
> > 
> > >  		return;
> > >  
> > > -	pc = &current->active_mm->context;
> > > +	pc = &mm->context;
> 
> So this appears to be the function:
> 
>  static void flush_ldt(void *current_mm)
>  {
>         struct mm_struct *mm = current_mm;
>         mm_context_t *pc;
> 
>         if (this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm) != current_mm)
>                 return;
> 
>         pc = &mm->context;
>         set_ldt(pc->ldt->entries, pc->ldt->size);
>  }
> 
> why not rename 'current_mm' to 'mm' and remove the 'mm' local variable?

Because you cannot dereference a void pointer, i.e. &mm->context ....

Thanks,

	tglx

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>