From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f70.google.com (mail-it0-f70.google.com [209.85.214.70]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A38E06B0388 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:54:10 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-it0-f70.google.com with SMTP id y196so57309453ity.1 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 09:54:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from resqmta-ch2-06v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-06v.sys.comcast.net. [2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:38]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 6si2650985ioj.112.2017.02.10.09.54.09 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 10 Feb 2017 09:54:09 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:54:06 -0600 (CST) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM TOPIC] slab reclaim In-Reply-To: <20170210145532.GQ10893@dhcp22.suse.cz> Message-ID: References: <20161228130949.GA11480@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20170102110257.GB18058@quack2.suse.cz> <20170210145532.GQ10893@dhcp22.suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Michal Hocko Cc: Vlastimil Babka , Jan Kara , lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org On Fri, 10 Feb 2017, Michal Hocko wrote: > Yeah, this is the email thread I have referenced in my initial email. I > didn't reference the first email because Dave had some concerns about > your approach and then the discussion moved on to an approach which > sounds reasonable to me [2] > > [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/2/8/329 Dont see much there to go on aside from the statement of the problem. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org