From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk0-f200.google.com (mail-qk0-f200.google.com [209.85.220.200]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B4696B0069 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 09:47:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-qk0-f200.google.com with SMTP id x11so90693030qka.5 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 06:47:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from resqmta-ch2-09v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-09v.sys.comcast.net. [2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:41]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a65si1945459qkc.140.2016.10.21.06.47.08 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 21 Oct 2016 06:47:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 08:44:41 -0500 (CDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: Rewording language in mbind(2) to "threads" not "processes" In-Reply-To: <67165fae-b965-eb34-ecf5-4247acaecee1@gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <67165fae-b965-eb34-ecf5-4247acaecee1@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" Cc: Piotr Kwapulinski , mhocko@kernel.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net, Peter Zijlstra , Rik van Riel , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , lkml , linux-man , Brice Goglin On Fri, 21 Oct 2016, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > Did you have any thoughts on my follow-on question below? There was only one AFAICT? > > Thanks. So, are all the other cases where I changed "process" to > > "thread" okay then? >>From what I see yes. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org