From: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: mm, vmstat: kernel BUG at mm/vmstat.c:1408!
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 09:45:12 -0600 (CST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1601210941540.7063@east.gentwo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160121082402.GA29520@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Thu, 21 Jan 2016, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > Since 0eb77e988032 ("vmstat: make vmstat_updater deferrable again and
> > > shut down on idle") quiet_vmstat might update cpu_stat_off and mark a
> > > particular cpu to be handled by vmstat_shepherd. This might trigger
> > > a VM_BUG_ON in vmstat_update because the work item might have been
> > > sleeping during the idle period and see the cpu_stat_off updated after
> > > the wake up. The VM_BUG_ON is therefore misleading and no more
> > > appropriate. Moreover it doesn't really suite any protection from real
> > > bugs because vmstat_shepherd will simply reschedule the vmstat_work
> > > anytime it sees a particular cpu set or vmstat_update would do the same
> > > from the worker context directly. Even when the two would race the
> > > result wouldn't be incorrect as the counters update is fully idempotent.
> >
> >
> > Hmmm... the vmstat_update can be interrupted while running and the cpu put
> > into idle mode? If vmstat_update is running then the cpu is not idle but
> > running code. If this is really going on then there is other stuff wrong
> > with the idling logic.
>
> The vmstat update might be still waiting for its timer, idle mode started
> and kick vmstat_update which might cpumask_test_and_set_cpu. Once the
> idle terminates and the originally schedule vmstate_update executes it
> sees the bit set and BUG_ON.
Ok so we are going into idle mode and the vmstat_update timer is pending.
Then the timer will not fire since going idle switches preemption off.
quiet_vmstat will run without the chance of running vmstat_update
We could be going idle and not have disabled preemption yet. Then
vmstat_update will run. On return to the idling operation preemption will
be disabled and quiet_vmstat() will be run.
I do not see how these two things could race.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-21 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-19 0:33 Sasha Levin
2015-12-21 13:08 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-12-21 20:28 ` Sasha Levin
2015-12-21 21:07 ` Sasha Levin
2015-12-21 21:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-12-22 17:21 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-12-24 20:14 ` Sasha Levin
2015-12-29 17:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-12-29 17:18 ` Christoph Lameter
2016-01-04 18:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2016-01-04 18:46 ` Sasha Levin
2016-01-12 11:31 ` Shiraz Hashim
2016-01-12 12:23 ` Christoph Lameter
2016-01-12 12:27 ` Shiraz Hashim
2016-01-13 11:36 ` Shiraz Hashim
2016-01-13 12:32 ` Shiraz Hashim
2016-01-14 21:06 ` Sasha Levin
2016-01-20 14:37 ` Michal Hocko
2016-01-20 14:56 ` Sasha Levin
2016-01-20 15:10 ` Michal Hocko
2016-01-20 15:20 ` Christoph Lameter
2016-01-20 15:49 ` Sasha Levin
2016-01-20 15:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2016-01-20 21:28 ` Michal Hocko
2016-01-20 21:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2016-01-21 8:24 ` Michal Hocko
2016-01-21 15:45 ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2016-01-21 16:51 ` Michal Hocko
2016-01-21 17:38 ` Christoph Lameter
2016-01-22 11:00 ` Shiraz Hashim
2016-01-22 14:04 ` Michal Hocko
2016-01-22 16:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2016-01-22 16:12 ` Michal Hocko
2016-01-22 16:46 ` Christoph Lameter
2016-01-22 17:12 ` Michal Hocko
2016-01-24 16:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-01-20 15:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2016-01-20 15:20 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1601210941540.7063@east.gentwo.org \
--to=cl@linux.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox