From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com (mail-wi0-f177.google.com [209.85.212.177]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E245A82F71 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 07:02:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: by wicfx3 with SMTP id fx3so27257950wic.1 for ; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 04:02:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de. [2001:470:1f0b:db:abcd:42:0:1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ct4si6651750wjb.45.2015.10.01.04.02.49 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 01 Oct 2015 04:02:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 13:02:09 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/25] x86, pkeys: Add Kconfig option In-Reply-To: <20150928191818.3378A6C9@viggo.jf.intel.com> Message-ID: References: <20150928191817.035A64E2@viggo.jf.intel.com> <20150928191818.3378A6C9@viggo.jf.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Dave Hansen Cc: borntraeger@de.ibm.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com On Mon, 28 Sep 2015, Dave Hansen wrote: > > From: Dave Hansen > > I don't have a strong opinion on whether we need a Kconfig prompt > or not. Protection Keys has relatively little code associated > with it, and it is not a heavyweight feature to keep enabled. > However, I can imagine that folks would still appreciate being > able to disable it. > > We will hide the prompt for now. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org