linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>,
	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] slub: build detached freelist with look-ahead
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 09:14:33 -0500 (CDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1507230912480.12258@east.gentwo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150723130917.6e46e7d0@redhat.com>

On Thu, 23 Jul 2015, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:

> > > I was hoping I could define this per slub runtime.  Any chance this
> > > would be made possible?
> >
> > It's not possible to set/reset slab merge in runtime. Once merging
> > happens, one slab could have objects from different kmem_caches so we
> > can't separate it cleanly. Current best approach is to prevent merging
> > when creating new kmem_cache by introducing new slab flag
> > like as SLAB_NO_MERGE.
>
> Yes, the best option would be a new flag (e.g. SLAB_NO_MERGE) when
> creating the kmem_cache.

If this is only in order to stability artificial test loads then the
current kernel parameter is fine afaict. Such a flag has been proposed
numerous times but we never did anything about these requests.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

      reply	other threads:[~2015-07-23 14:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-15 16:01 [PATCH 0/3] slub: introducing detached freelist Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-07-15 16:01 ` [PATCH 1/3] slub: extend slowpath __slab_free() to handle bulk free Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-07-15 16:54   ` Christoph Lameter
2015-07-15 16:02 ` [PATCH 2/3] slub: optimize bulk slowpath free by detached freelist Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-07-15 16:56   ` Christoph Lameter
2015-07-15 16:02 ` [PATCH 3/3] slub: build detached freelist with look-ahead Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-07-16  9:57   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-07-20  2:54     ` Joonsoo Kim
2015-07-20 21:28       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-07-21 13:50         ` Christoph Lameter
2015-07-21 23:28           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-07-23  6:34             ` Joonsoo Kim
2015-07-23 11:09               ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-07-23 14:14                 ` Christoph Lameter [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.11.1507230912480.12258@east.gentwo.org \
    --to=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox